Telangana High Court
Anugandula Abhinay kumar v. State of Telengana
CRLP/12415/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-08-17
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- B. R. Madhusudhan Rao
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.12415 of 2026 DATED: 17th AUGUST, 2026 Between: Anugandula Abhinay Kumar ... Petitioner-Accused And The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad. ... Respondent-Complainant ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail who is arrayed as accused in connection with FIR No.552 of 2026 of Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad. The offence alleged against the petitioner-Accused is punishable under Section 64(1) of BNS. 2. Heard Sri G. Ravichandran, learned counsel for petitioner – Accused and Sri D.Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent - State. 2 BRMR,J Crl.P.No.12415 of 2026 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner – accused is falsely implicated in the case and he has been in remand since 25.06.2026, entire investigation is completed and prayed to enlarge the petitioner – accused on bail. 4. Notice issued to the de facto complainant is served, proof is filed to that effect. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that Section 183 of BNSS statement of the de facto complainant is recorded on 01.08.2026.
6. De facto complainant lodged a report before the Banjara Hills Police Station on 24.06.2026 stating that the petitioner – accused has repeatedly insisted on coming to her residence. Initially, she refused but the petitioner – accused has continuously pursued her to have sexual intercourse. The petitioner – accused engaged in sexual intercourse while in contact. On 22.06.2026, the petitioner – accused again came to her residence, had sexual intercourse. The petitioner – accused was arrested on 25.06.2026 and he was produced before the concerned Magistrate for remand. 3 BRMR,J Crl.P.No.12415 of 2026 7. The Remand case Diary shows that the respondent -State has examined L.Ws.1 to 12 apart from examining four Police Officers, out of them two police officers assisted the Investigating Officer, one Police Officer who registered FIR and one Investigating Officer. 8. Section 183 of BNSS statement of the victim is recorded on 01.08.2026 and the investigation is at fag end, detaining the petitioner – accused further in judicial custody will not serve any purpose. 9. In the result, criminal petition is allowed subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioner – accused shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad.
ii. The petitioner – Accused shall appear before the concerned SHO in between 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., on every Sunday for a period of four (4) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation and thereafter, as and when required. 4 BRMR,J Crl.P.No.12415 of 2026 iii. The petitioner – accused shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS). iv. The petitioner – Accused shall not directly or indirectly influence, threaten, or induce any of the prosecution witnesses. v. In the event of violation of any of the above conditions, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. ______________________________ B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J 17th August, 2026 SAI 5 BRMR,J Crl.P.No.12415 of 2026 THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.12415 of 2026 DATE: 17.08.2026 SAI