132191 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 24719 OF 2026 Between: years, 1. Rambabu Gudimella Tirumala, S/o. Krishnama Chary, aged 64 Occ. Employee at Pragati Resorts, Fl/o. Flat No.1507 Subishi Fortune Towers Shankarpally Mandal, Mokila Ranga Reddy District. 2. Ramadevi Gudimella, Tirumala Wo. Rambabu Gudimella Tirumala aged 58 years, Occ. Housewife FL/o. Flat No.1507 Subishi Fortune Towers Shankarpally Mandal, Mokila Ranga Reddy District. 3. Aditya Kumar Gudimella Tirumala, S/o. Rambabu Gudimella Tirumala aged 34 years, Occ. Student M.S. (medical) Pragati Resorts, F|/ o. FIat No.'l507 Subishi Fortune Towers Shankarpally Mandal, Mokila Ranga Reddy District. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department Telangana Secretariat Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Gachibowli, Hyderabad 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Zone 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Mokila Police Station Narsingi Division Cyberabad. 5. The Station House Officer, Mokila Police Station Narsingi Division Cyberabad. Chairman M. 6. Pragati Green Meadows and Resorts Ltd., Rep. by its Ramakrishna, S/o. not known aged 65 years, Office. Plot No.13554,3rd Floor Road No.'1 &45 Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033

7. Pragati Green Meadows and Reso(s Ltd., Rep. by its Human Resource Department Mr. Satyanarayana Reddy S/o. not known, aged 55 years Office. Plot No.13554, 3rd Floor Road No.1& 45 Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders one in the nature of Writ of l,4andamus declaring the action of Respondent for not considering the representation dated 18-05-2026 and 18-07 -2026 in pursuance of the orders passed in Crl.P.No.6413 of 2026. Thereafter, on a bail petition in Crl P.No.9699 of 2026 to strictly follow the Arnesh Kumar case reported in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in 2014(8) SCC and further direct the Respondent not to harass the Petitioner by' imposing 3rd degree punishment and torturing in the police station in view of the orders passed in WP No. 12174 of 2026 not to interfere into the personal life and liberty of the Petitioner herein and further drrect the Respondent to consider the representation made by the Petitioner dated 18-05-2026 and 18-07-2026 in the interest of justice and declare the action of Respondent as illegal, arbitrary, ultra-vires, against the principles of natural justice, violation of Art. 19 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and also against Sec.35(2) of BNS Act. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to strictly follow the Arnesh Kumar case reported in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar reported in 2u a(8) scc and further direct the Respondent not to harass the Petitioner by imposing 3rd degree punishment and torturing in the police station in view of the orders passed in wP No. 12174 of 2026 nol to interfere into the personal life and libefty of the Petitroner herein and further d,rect the Respondent to consider the representation made by the Petitioner dated 18',05'2026 and 1g-07-2026 in the interest of justice and declare the action of Respondent as i egal. arbitrary, ultra-vires, against the principles of natural justice, violation of Art. 19 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and also against Sec.35(2),1 BNS Act Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SURESH SHIV SAGAR Counsel forthe Respondents: AGp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER IN TIIE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEYI WRIT PETITION No.24719 of2026 DATE: 06.08.2026 Between: Rambabu Gudimella Tirumala and 2 others Petitioners AND The State ofTelangana and 6 others. . . . Respondents OR,DER

This Writ Petition is filed alleging interference by the respondent police with the life and liberty of the petitioners, without taking into consideration the orders passed by this Court in Crl.P.No.6413 of 2026 and Cr1.p.No.9699 of 2026, wherein a direction was issued to strictly follow the guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v. Stqte of Bihart . 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and ieamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home, appearing for respondents No.1 to 5. '1zor+1 s scc zl3 TMD,J wP 241\9 2026 2 3. Leamed counsel lbr the petitioners submitted that the petitroners apprehend the use of third-degree methods for eliciting certain inforntation fiom them and that the respondent police are not fbllou ing the orde rs passed by thrs Court in the aforesaid cases 4. Leamed .\ssistant Government Pleader for Home has fumished a copy of the *'r'itten instructions received by him and submitted that, pursuant to the orders of this Court, notices under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya \agarik Suraksha Sanhita. 2023 rfor short, "BNSS"), have already been tssued to the petitioners and that there is no interference with their personal life or liberty, as alleged. It is lurther submitted that the petitioners are not cooperating with the investigating agency and have fl led the present Writ Petition on false and baseless allegations.

5. Ha,,ing regard to the rival contentions and the fact that the petitioners are accused in F.l.R.No.186 of 2026, and that this Court has already directed issuance of notices under Section 35(3) of the BNSS. pursuanr to rvhich such notices have been issued and the petirroners clainr to ha'e submitted their explanations thereto, this Gourt directs the respondent-police to follow the procedure prescribed TMD,J wP 24719 2026 5 under law and shall not interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioners without any justifiable cause. 6. With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, ifany, pending shall stand closed. SD/. P.C.SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary Home Department, The State of Telangana, Telangana Secretariat Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Gachibowli, Hyderabad 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Zone Division 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, IVlokila Police Station Narsingi Cyberabad. 5. The Station House Officer, IVokila Police Station Narsingi Division Cyberabad. 6. One CC to Sri Suresh Shiv Sagar, Advocate [OPUC] at 7. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad [OUT] 8. Two CD Copies rr Yt- TKS HIGH COURT CC TODAY DATED: 0610812026 ,.4oBiC,t Srzl ORDER ,:) D -fr AUG 2028 ..) 1 4WP.No.24719 ot 2026 ! * D6,SPATcl\

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ccP@ \a d\(\']!

132191 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 24719 OF 2026 Between: years, 1. Rambabu Gudimella Tirumala, S/o. Krishnama Chary, aged 64 Occ. Employee at Pragati Resorts, Fl/o. Flat No.1507 Subishi Fortune Towers Shankarpally Mandal, Mokila Ranga Reddy District. 2. Ramadevi Gudimella, Tirumala Wo. Rambabu Gudimella Tirumala aged 58 years, Occ. Housewife FL/o. Flat No.1507 Subishi Fortune Towers Shankarpally Mandal, Mokila Ranga Reddy District. 3. Aditya Kumar Gudimella Tirumala, S/o. Rambabu Gudimella Tirumala aged 34 years, Occ. Student M.S. (medical) Pragati Resorts, F|/ o. FIat No.'l507 Subishi Fortune Towers Shankarpally Mandal, Mokila Ranga Reddy District. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department Telangana Secretariat Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Gachibowli, Hyderabad 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Zone 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Mokila Police Station Narsingi Division Cyberabad. 5. The Station House Officer, Mokila Police Station Narsingi Division Cyberabad. Chairman M. 6. Pragati Green Meadows and Resorts Ltd., Rep. by its Ramakrishna, S/o. not known aged 65 years, Office. Plot No.13554,3rd Floor Road No.'1 &45 Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033

7. Pragati Green Meadows and Reso(s Ltd., Rep. by its Human Resource Department Mr. Satyanarayana Reddy S/o. not known, aged 55 years Office. Plot No.13554, 3rd Floor Road No.1& 45 Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders one in the nature of Writ of l,4andamus declaring the action of Respondent for not considering the representation dated 18-05-2026 and 18-07 -2026 in pursuance of the orders passed in Crl.P.No.6413 of 2026. Thereafter, on a bail petition in Crl P.No.9699 of 2026 to strictly follow the Arnesh Kumar case reported in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in 2014(8) SCC and further direct the Respondent not to harass the Petitioner by' imposing 3rd degree punishment and torturing in the police station in view of the orders passed in WP No. 12174 of 2026 not to interfere into the personal life and liberty of the Petitioner herein and further drrect the Respondent to consider the representation made by the Petitioner dated 18-05-2026 and 18-07-2026 in the interest of justice and declare the action of Respondent as illegal, arbitrary, ultra-vires, against the principles of natural justice, violation of Art. 19 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and also against Sec.35(2) of BNS Act. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to strictly follow the Arnesh Kumar case reported in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar reported in 2u a(8) scc and further direct the Respondent not to harass the Petitioner by imposing 3rd degree punishment and torturing in the police station in view of the orders passed in wP No. 12174 of 2026 nol to interfere into the personal life and libefty of the Petitroner herein and further d,rect the Respondent to consider the representation made by the Petitioner dated 18',05'2026 and 1g-07-2026 in the interest of justice and declare the action of Respondent as i egal. arbitrary, ultra-vires, against the principles of natural justice, violation of Art. 19 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and also against Sec.35(2),1 BNS Act Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SURESH SHIV SAGAR Counsel forthe Respondents: AGp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER IN TIIE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEYI WRIT PETITION No.24719 of2026 DATE: 06.08.2026 Between: Rambabu Gudimella Tirumala and 2 others Petitioners AND The State ofTelangana and 6 others. . . . Respondents OR,DER

This Writ Petition is filed alleging interference by the respondent police with the life and liberty of the petitioners, without taking into consideration the orders passed by this Court in Crl.P.No.6413 of 2026 and Cr1.p.No.9699 of 2026, wherein a direction was issued to strictly follow the guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v. Stqte of Bihart . 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and ieamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home, appearing for respondents No.1 to 5. '1zor+1 s scc zl3 TMD,J wP 241\9 2026 2 3. Leamed counsel lbr the petitioners submitted that the petitroners apprehend the use of third-degree methods for eliciting certain inforntation fiom them and that the respondent police are not fbllou ing the orde rs passed by thrs Court in the aforesaid cases 4. Leamed .\ssistant Government Pleader for Home has fumished a copy of the *'r'itten instructions received by him and submitted that, pursuant to the orders of this Court, notices under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya \agarik Suraksha Sanhita. 2023 rfor short, "BNSS"), have already been tssued to the petitioners and that there is no interference with their personal life or liberty, as alleged. It is lurther submitted that the petitioners are not cooperating with the investigating agency and have fl led the present Writ Petition on false and baseless allegations.

5. Ha,,ing regard to the rival contentions and the fact that the petitioners are accused in F.l.R.No.186 of 2026, and that this Court has already directed issuance of notices under Section 35(3) of the BNSS. pursuanr to rvhich such notices have been issued and the petirroners clainr to ha'e submitted their explanations thereto, this Gourt directs the respondent-police to follow the procedure prescribed TMD,J wP 24719 2026 5 under law and shall not interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioners without any justifiable cause. 6. With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, ifany, pending shall stand closed. SD/. P.C.SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary Home Department, The State of Telangana, Telangana Secretariat Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Gachibowli, Hyderabad 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Zone Division 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, IVlokila Police Station Narsingi Cyberabad. 5. The Station House Officer, IVokila Police Station Narsingi Division Cyberabad. 6. One CC to Sri Suresh Shiv Sagar, Advocate [OPUC] at 7. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad [OUT] 8. Two CD Copies rr Yt- TKS HIGH COURT CC TODAY DATED: 0610812026 ,.4oBiC,t Srzl ORDER ,:) D -fr AUG 2028 ..) 1 4WP.No.24719 ot 2026 ! * D6,SPATcl\

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ccP@ \a d\(\']!