HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA MAIN CASE: F.C.A.No.321 of 2017 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. OFFICE DATE ORDERNo NOTE 04.08.2026 KL,J & SKS,J I.A.No.1 of 2017 This application is filed seeking to condone the delay of 842 days in preferring the appeal. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that even though petitioner was informed that the said O.P. was dismissed, due to misunderstanding, copy of the impugned order was not obtained and also due to paucity of funds, petitioner could not prefer the appeal immediately. Therefore, there was a delay of 842 days in preferring the appeal. Having satisfied with the reasons mentioned in the accompanying affidavit and also considering the fact that the disputes between the petitioner and respondent are matrimonial disputes, this application is ordered. Delay of 842 days in preferring the appeal is condoned. ____________ KL,J ____________ SKS,J F.C.A.No.321 of 2017 This appeal is dismissed as infructuous. (vso) B/o. ynk

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA MAIN CASE: F.C.A.No.321 of 2017 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. OFFICE DATE ORDERNo NOTE 04.08.2026 KL,J & SKS,J I.A.No.1 of 2017 This application is filed seeking to condone the delay of 842 days in preferring the appeal. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that even though petitioner was informed that the said O.P. was dismissed, due to misunderstanding, copy of the impugned order was not obtained and also due to paucity of funds, petitioner could not prefer the appeal immediately. Therefore, there was a delay of 842 days in preferring the appeal. Having satisfied with the reasons mentioned in the accompanying affidavit and also considering the fact that the disputes between the petitioner and respondent are matrimonial disputes, this application is ordered. Delay of 842 days in preferring the appeal is condoned. ____________ KL,J ____________ SKS,J F.C.A.No.321 of 2017 This appeal is dismissed as infructuous. (vso) B/o. ynk