Telangana High Court
Ekamamidi Venkat Reddy v. The State of Telanagana
CRLP/11517/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-07-28
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- B. R. Madhusudhan Rao
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.11517 of 2026 DATED 28th JULY 2026 Between: A1. Ekamamidi Venkat Reddy A2. Ekmamidi Siddeshwar Reddy ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 And The State of Telangana, Through S.H.O. Nawabpet Police Station, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad. ... Respondent/Complainant O R D E R This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioners-Accused Nos.1 and 2 on bail in connection with FIR No.78 of 2026 of Nawabpet Police Station, Vikarabad. The offence alleged against the petitioners are punishable under Sections 109, 126(2), 115(2), 352 r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). 2 BRMR,J Crl.P.No.11517 of 2026 2. Heard Sri Dasi Ramesh, learned counsel for petitioners-A1 and A2 and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for respondent – State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners – A1 and A2 submits that basing on the statement of LW.1 - S.Ramchandraiah, S.I. of Police, Nawabpet instructed the S.H.O. to register a case under Sections 109, 126(2), 115(2), 352 r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). During the course of investigation, petitioners – A1 and A2 were arrested by the police, Nawabpet. Petitioner No.1 – A1 is an agriculturist, petitioner No.2 – A2 is a student studying Intermediate. Petitioner No.2 – A2 has no criminal antecedents who is aged about 19 years. They were remanded to judicial custody on 02.07.2026. A3 and A4 were served with notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS by police, Nawabpet and they are cooperating with investigation and the entire investigation is completed, prayed to enlarge the petitioners-A1 and A2 on bail. 4. Per contra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that only 10 witnesses were examined by the police and also placed the Injury Certificate of LW.1 – S.Ramchandriah. 3 BRMR,J Crl.P.No.11517 of 2026
5. As per the Remand Case Diary dated 02.07.2026, petitioners – A1 and A2 were arrested and remanded to judicial custody. The remand case diary goes to show that 10 witnesses were examined as on 02.07.2026. In internal Page 4 of the remand case diary in Para No.3, it is stated that A1 (petitioner No.1 herein) produced an axe length about 23 inches, cutting edge length 5 cms and head length 3 cms and Black and Red colour Hero Glamour Br. No.TS07EP3089 and the same is seized in the presence of LW.7 – I.Venkat Reddy and LW.8 – Ch.Paramesh. 6. On perusal of the Medico Legal Case – Patient Record, LW.1 – S.Ramchandraiah has received four injuries, which are simple in nature. Investigation is at the fag end of the matter, detaining of the petitioners – A1 and A2 will not help the case of the prosecution since the investigation is completed and filing of charge sheet is formal. This Court is of the view that the petitioners-accused Nos.1 and 2 are entitled for grant of bail, subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioners-accused Nos.1 and 2 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten 4 BRMR,J Crl.P.No.11517 of 2026 Thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate at Vikarabad.
ii. The petitioners-accused Nos.1 and 2 shall appear before the concerned SHO between 11:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., on every Sunday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation and thereafter, as and when required. iii. The petitioners-accused Nos.1 and 2 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS). iv. The petitioners-accused Nos.1 and 2 shall not directly or indirectly influence, threaten, or induce any of the prosecution witnesses. v. In the event of violation of any of the above conditions, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail. 5 BRMR,J Crl.P.No.11517 of 2026 8. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. ______________________________ B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J Date: 28.07.2026 PLV 6 BRMR,J Crl.P.No.11517 of 2026 THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.11517 of 2026 DATE: 28.07.2026 PLV