IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.10906 of 2026 DATE: 20.07.2026 Between: Mohammad Fasiuddin @ Faizan …Petitioner/accused AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Through SHO, Narayanpet Town Police Station, Narayanpet District and another. …Respondents/de-facto Complainant O R D E R This Criminal Petition is filed before this Court for grant of bail to the Petitioner who is arrayed as accused in FIR No.170 of 2026 of Narayanpet town Police Station, Narayanpet District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 64(2)(n), 108 of the BNS and Sections 5(1) r/w 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. 2. The case of the prosecution is that, on 31.05.2026, the de-facto complainant, who is the mother of victim, lodged a report before the police stating that she blessed with three daughters. She used to work in the houses and take care of her three - 2 -

children. Her elder daughter stopped her further studies and working in Munir Kirana Shop, the petitioner herein followed her daughter on the name of love and harassed her mentally and physically. Further, they came to know that several times in their absence he visited their house and subjected her to sexual intercourse on the name of love and pretend of marriage. On 31.05.2026 in their absence he came to their house and subjected her to sexual intercourse forcibly and picked up quarrel with her daughter and rejected to marry her, when she questioned him to marry her. In this regard his daughter disgusted on her life unable to inform to anybody, she committed suicide by hanging with saree in their house to a fan. Hence, the complainant requested to take necessary action. Basing on the said complaint, the police registered a case for the above said offences. 3. Heard Sri Khaja Moinuddin, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1-State. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent of the said allegations and he is falsely implicated in the present case and there is no such suicide note collected by the investigating authority to show that, because of the petitioner herein, she committed suicide, they earlier warned the petitioner and there is no such offence committed by the - 3 -

petitioner and he is aged about 18 years. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to him by allowing this criminal petition. 5. On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the allegations against the petitioner herein are serious and heinous in nature and the petitioner herein is responsible for the death of the deceased and that apart, he also sexually exploited the deceased, as such, the petitioner is not entitled for the bail. Further, the investigation is not yet completed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition. 6. In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the petitioner herein is aged about 18 years and he is in jail since 01.06.2026. As seen from the remand case diary, the prosecution witnesses, LWs 1 to 13 have already been examined. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the allegations, the stage of investigation, the period of incarceration of the petitioner, this Court finds it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees - 4 - Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Narayanpet.

ii. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required. iii. The petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS). 7. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 20.07.2026 TU - 5 - THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.10906 OF 2026 DATE 20.07.2026 TU

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.10906 of 2026 DATE: 20.07.2026 Between: Mohammad Fasiuddin @ Faizan …Petitioner/accused AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Through SHO, Narayanpet Town Police Station, Narayanpet District and another. …Respondents/de-facto Complainant O R D E R This Criminal Petition is filed before this Court for grant of bail to the Petitioner who is arrayed as accused in FIR No.170 of 2026 of Narayanpet town Police Station, Narayanpet District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 64(2)(n), 108 of the BNS and Sections 5(1) r/w 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. 2. The case of the prosecution is that, on 31.05.2026, the de-facto complainant, who is the mother of victim, lodged a report before the police stating that she blessed with three daughters. She used to work in the houses and take care of her three - 2 -

children. Her elder daughter stopped her further studies and working in Munir Kirana Shop, the petitioner herein followed her daughter on the name of love and harassed her mentally and physically. Further, they came to know that several times in their absence he visited their house and subjected her to sexual intercourse on the name of love and pretend of marriage. On 31.05.2026 in their absence he came to their house and subjected her to sexual intercourse forcibly and picked up quarrel with her daughter and rejected to marry her, when she questioned him to marry her. In this regard his daughter disgusted on her life unable to inform to anybody, she committed suicide by hanging with saree in their house to a fan. Hence, the complainant requested to take necessary action. Basing on the said complaint, the police registered a case for the above said offences. 3. Heard Sri Khaja Moinuddin, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1-State. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent of the said allegations and he is falsely implicated in the present case and there is no such suicide note collected by the investigating authority to show that, because of the petitioner herein, she committed suicide, they earlier warned the petitioner and there is no such offence committed by the - 3 -

petitioner and he is aged about 18 years. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to him by allowing this criminal petition. 5. On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the allegations against the petitioner herein are serious and heinous in nature and the petitioner herein is responsible for the death of the deceased and that apart, he also sexually exploited the deceased, as such, the petitioner is not entitled for the bail. Further, the investigation is not yet completed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition. 6. In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the petitioner herein is aged about 18 years and he is in jail since 01.06.2026. As seen from the remand case diary, the prosecution witnesses, LWs 1 to 13 have already been examined. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the allegations, the stage of investigation, the period of incarceration of the petitioner, this Court finds it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees - 4 - Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Narayanpet.

ii. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required. iii. The petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS). 7. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 20.07.2026 TU - 5 - THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.10906 OF 2026 DATE 20.07.2026 TU