[ 34sl I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD . FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO: 642 OF 2026 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters patent Appeal prefened Against the Order dated 27.02.2026 in WP No 11087 ot 2026 on the file of the High Court. Between: '1. Mr.Pindi Narsimha Reddy, S/o Late Mr.Pindi pulla Reddy Aged about.70 years, Occupation .Business Rl/o Biramal Guda Old yillage, 7-1-173, Karmangat Ranga Reddy Telangana 2. Mr.Pindi Mahender Reddy, S/o Late Mr.Pindi Pulla Reddy Aged about .64 years, Occupation. Business R/o 8-7-93/ne/19, Opp ppR Garden, pindi pulla Reddy Colony Hasthinapuram North Extension, Saroomagar, Vaishalinagar, Ranga Reddy District, 500079 3. Mr.Pindi Srinivas Reddy, S/o Late Mr.Pindi pulla Reddy Aged about .64 years, Occupation Business, R/o 8-7-93/ne/19, Opp ppR Garden, pindi pulla Reddy Colony ...APPELLANTS AND 1. Mr.Khaja Fahat Hussain, S/o Khaja Shakir Hussain R/o H.No. 12-13-98, Tarnaka, Secunderabad. 2. Mrs.Mutktharunnisa, W/o Late Khaja Nazir Hussain R/o H.No. 12'13-gB, Tarnaka, Secunderabad. 3. Khaja Wajid Hussain, S/o Khaja Nazir Jussain R/o H.No. 12-13-98, Tarnaka, Secunderabad- 4. Mohd. Ameen, S/o Khaja Nazir R/o H.No. 12-13-98, Tarnaka, Secunderabad 5. Mir Sattar Ali, S/o Late Mir Sadath Ali R/o H.No. 12-13-98, Tarnaka, Secunderabad.

6. Mir Hameed Ali, S/o Late Mir Sadath Ali Rl/o H.No. 12-13-98, Tarnaka, Secunderabad 7. Mir Muzzamil Ali, S/o Late Mir Razack Ali R/o H.No 12-13-98, Tarnaka, Secunderabad 8. Mir Dastagir AIi, S/o Late Mir lftekhar Ali R/o HNo 12-13-98 Tarnaka Secunderabad ...RESPONDENTS/WRIT PETITIONERS 9. Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District At Hyderabad 10. Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad East Division Malakunta Gosha Mahal Hyderabad 11.Tadeti Sai Reddy, S/o Venkat Ram Reddy R/o Bairamalguda Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District '12. Edulakanti Narsimha Reddy, s/o narsis Reddy R/o Bairamalguda Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 13. G Ram Reddy, S/o Narsi Reddy Rio Bairamalguda Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 14. Chakali Venkaiah, S/o Agaiah Rio Karmanghat village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 15.P Ramanand Guptha, S/o Gunnaiah Gupta R/o Saroornagar village Mandal RR District '16.W Raju, S/o Tirupathi Raju Rio Bairam alguda village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District '17. Smt Devamma @ Devakamma, Wo Satyanarayana Reddy R/o 18. T. Ramanand guptha, S/o Gunnaiah Guptha R/o Karmanghat village,Saroornagar Mandal, R.R. District. '19. Gajasimha Rao, S/o Anantha Kishan Rao Rio Karmanghat village, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R. District. 20. Devamma@ Devakamma, Wo Satyanarayana Reddy, R/o Karmanghat village, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R. District. 21. Edulakanti Bal Reddy, S/o Narsi Reddy, R/o Bairarnalguda village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

22. Edulakanti Lachma Reddy, So Narsa Reddy R/o Bairam alguda village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 23. G. Ram Reddy, S/o Narsi Reddy R/o Karmanghat village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distriit. 24. Darsi Laxma Reddy, S/o Malla Reddy, Rio Sultan valva village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 25. Sama Yad Reddy, S/o Mutha Reddy R/o Champapet village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 26. Sama Bal Reddy, Sio Seetha Reddy. R/o Champapet village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 27.Sama Kista Reddy, So Yella Reddy R/o Champapet village. Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 28. Sama Rami Reddy, S/o Bal Reddy R/o Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 29. Seethamma, W/o Yella Reddy R/o Bairam alguda village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District . 30.Eluventi Anji Reddy, S/o Kistaiah R/o Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 31. Elimineti Anji Reddy, S/o Kistaiah R/o Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 32. Elimineti Rama Reddy, S/o Kistaiah Rio Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 33. Elimineti Buchi Reddy, S/o Janga Reddy Rio Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy Diskict 34.Vennu Prathap Reddy, S/o Yella Reddy Rio Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 35.Vennu Prathap Reddy, S/o Yella Reddy Rio Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District

36. Jakka Balamma, Wo late Badaru Shivaiah Rio Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy Dist Dismissed For Defaulty Against RR 11 To 29, 32, 34, To 36 37.T Pradeep Kumar, S/o Late T Ramanath Guptlia Aged about 70 years Occ Business and Agriculture Rio Karmanghat Siroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 38.T Vidya Bhushan, s/o Late TRamanath Guptha Aged about 67 years occ Business and Agriculture Rio Karmanghi Saroornagar Manal Ranga Reddy District 39.T Virupaksha, S/o Late T Rarnanath Guptha Aged about 67 years occ Business and Agriculture Rio Karmanghit Saroornagar Manal Ranga Reddy District RR 37 to 39 implead as per CO dt 13.09.2023 lA No I of 2022 40. Koyalakonda Sudhakar, S/o Late K Sathaiah Aged about 60 years Occ Business R/o PNo 549 Vaidehi Nagar Opp Allahabad Bank Saheb Nagar Kalan Vanasthalipuram Ranga Reddy District RR 40 implead as per CO dt21.02.2025lA No 1 ol 2025 41. Koyalakonda Ravinder Kumar, So Late K Babaiah Aged about 55 years Occ PvtEmployee R/o HNo 8-1-238 Old Karmanaghat Village Near Gandhi Statue Saroornagar Ranga Reddy District 42. Koyalakonda Raj Kumar, S/o Late K Babaiah Aged about 45 years Occ PvtEmployee R/o HNo 8-1-238 Old Karmanaghat Village Near Gandhi Statue Saroornagar Ranga Reddy District 43. Koyalakonda Mahender Kumar, S/o Late K Babaiah Aged about 55 years Occ PvtEmployee R/o HNo 8-1-238 Old Karmanaghat Village Near Gandhi Statue Saroornagar Ranga Reddy District

44. Koyalakonda DevRaj, S/o Late K Ramulu Aged pbout 45 years Occ GovtEmployee R/o HNo 8-1-235 Old Karmanaghat Village Near Gandhi Statue Saroornagar Ranga Reddy District RR 41 to 44 implead as per CO dt 04122025 lA No 2 of 2022 Respondents Nos 11 to 44 are not necessary parties ...RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 4OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated 27 -02-2026 in WP.No.'1 1087 of 2004- to the extent of setting aside the Occupancy Right Certificate issued to Late Mr.Pindi Pulla Reddy in respect to Acres 03-00 Gts in Sy.No.18 of Karmanghat Village vide proceedings dated 10-12-1979 in Proc No E1336197.. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI VIVEK JAIN FOR SRI SAMHITHA NIMMALA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 8: SRI SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.9&10: SRI MURALIDHAR REDDY KATRAM, GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.11 lo 44: - - -The Court made the following; JUDGMENT HIGH COURT F sTATE O F GANA AT HYDE THE HON1BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON'BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.642 oF 2026 DATE: 1 7.o7.2026 Between: Mr. Pindi Narsimha Reddy and two othcrs Appellants And Mr Khaja Fahat Flussain and 43 others Responden ts \,1r. Vivek Jain, icarncd

appca-ng counsr,l . cprcscnting Ms Samhirha Njmmala, learned counsel lor thc appcllanLs. \4r. Srint,,asa Rar.: porlur.r. iearn(,d coLrnsel appcarlng lor the respondent Nos. l g Vr. Muralrdhar Rcdd-! l\..rJm,. tn, appea rcorn, d Covcrnment pleadcr [or Revcn ue ng lo. the respono(nt 1g \os o 6no JUDGMENT: (Per tlon blc Justrce Moushumi Bhattacharya) 1. The Writ Appeai has been lilcd against an order dated 27 .02.2026 passed b.v- a learned Single Judge of this Court, allowing W.p.No.I lOgT ol 2OO4 liled by the respondent Nos.l g herein, secking a Writ of Certiorari and to quash a Common Order dated 03.03 2004 passed by the Joint Collecror, Ranga Reddl' District, in several Appeal Cascs, whereby the Joint Collcctor conlirmr:d the Occupanc,r, Rights grantcd in favour ol tht' nrspondct-rIs b.' tht' Rcvcnue Divisional Officer, East Division. Ranga Rcddr District. 2. 'l'he erppcllants are the sons and legal representatives ol the respondcnt Nrr. 13 in thc Writ Petition 3. Bv thc impugncd order dated 27 .02.2026, the learned Single,luclge alloucd the WriL PcLjtion br, qLrashing thc Contmon Order clated 03.03.2001 passed br the Joint Coilector. Ranga Reddl DistricL. and bl sctting aslde thc orders of lhe Revenue Divisional Ollicer. trast Ili.. isron. Rang:r llcdclr' DistricL ('ltDO) granting Ocr:upancv Righr Ccrtificates (OIiCs) rn favour of thc r''spondenr \os..l .1J tirer.irr.

4. The leirrnecl Sinlllc ,JLrdge also rcmandcd the mattcr to thc RI)O to concluct a frcsh cnquin anci drspose r,l tht' mattcr in accordance ,.r'ith 1au'. altcr issuing noti(--es :.o all thc u-ril p('titioners (, he lcqal hcirs ol thc original inamdtrr), as u.ell as tcr thc private respondents. and alfording thenr a reasonable opportr-rni[v of bcing ]'rearc1. Thc RDO u,trs further directed to rt'cord specilic lindings on all jurisdictional iacts, including posscssron as on 0 1 I 1 1973, and to ('ompl( te lhc r:xcrcise rr ithin six rnontl'rs from the dzrte o1 rcc(-.ipl ol a copl of the in.rpugned o:-clcr. J 5. Learned counsei appearing for lhe appellants submits that the proceedings before the RDO attained finality in 2008 upon deletion of thc u.rit petilioners' holding and in vierv of the lailure oi thc u,rit pcritioncrs/legal heirs of the original inamdar to question the said dcletion procecdings. Counsel furlher submits that the respondent No. I3 in rhc Writ Petition (the lather of thc writ appellants) passed a\.\,'ay on 04.09. 1991, which ought to have becn takcn into considcration by the learned Single .Judge as a fundamental defect in granting any relief against thc respondent No. 13. 6. The respondcnt Nos. I 8 (writ petitioners) are represented

7. After hearing lcarncd counscl appcarlng for the partics and considcring the fact that the learned Single Judge has directed the RDO ro arrive at a final decision onl1. after issuing notice and affording a sufficient opportunity of being heard to all the concerned parties, we deem it fit to disposc of the Wnt Appeal by drrecting thc RDO to specifically consider the submissions made b1'' the appellants on behalf of the respondent No.13 in the Writ Petition, rvith regard to the failure ol writ petitioncrs/lcgai heirs of the original inamdar to challenge the delction ol holdings rn 2008 and the disputed questions having attaincd finalitf in 2008 itsel[. The RDO shall -+

also take into consideralion the fact that the respondent No 13 in the Writ Petrlion (the father of the appellants) passed awav in lggl.u,hereasthewrltPetitionrt.asliledin2004seekingrelief against several respondents, including the responrlent No 13' impugne d Common Orcier dated 27 02 2026 8. Since the r'u'e deem has bcen challcngeci b-r rlal ol the prcsent Writ Appcal' it appropriale to extend the tlme granted b1' the learned Single Judge to the RDO to dispose of the matter' The RDO shall dispose of rhc miitter n irhrn stx months frorn thc date of reccipt ol a copy of this order' Needless to sa)', an'u' sL(rps taken up b]-anr authoriLl . including the RDO, in relation to the subject matter of disputc, shall remain stayed until the matter is finally drsposed of br rhe RDO bi passing a rcasoncd order, as directed by Lhe learnecl Srnglc Judge. connected 9. W.A.No 642 of 2026, along all "r'ith Lhe above app[cations, rs accordrngll disposed of tn lerms of There shall bc no ordcr as to costs. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO Sd/.NAYANI DEPUTY REGISTRAR ,/TRUE COPY// SECTI ON OFFICER To, 1 The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy' District At Hyderabad 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Hyderabad East Division Malakunta Gosha Mahal HYderabad 3. One CC to SRt SAMHTTHA N|MMALA, Advocate tOpUCl 4. One CC to SRt SRTNIVASA RAO PUTLUR|, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two ccs to GP FoR REVENUE, High court for the state of rerangana at Hyderabad . [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies PMK HIGH COURT CC TODAY

DATED: 1710712026 HE ST414:JUDGMENT 1 WA.No.642 ot 2026 ?) .P 2!i?6 I 17.t!!r / :,/ {. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS q 'iL 1 \:J.

[ 34sl I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD . FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO: 642 OF 2026 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters patent Appeal prefened Against the Order dated 27.02.2026 in WP No 11087 ot 2026 on the file of the High Court. Between: '1. Mr.Pindi Narsimha Reddy, S/o Late Mr.Pindi pulla Reddy Aged about.70 years, Occupation .Business Rl/o Biramal Guda Old yillage, 7-1-173, Karmangat Ranga Reddy Telangana 2. Mr.Pindi Mahender Reddy, S/o Late Mr.Pindi Pulla Reddy Aged about .64 years, Occupation. Business R/o 8-7-93/ne/19, Opp ppR Garden, pindi pulla Reddy Colony Hasthinapuram North Extension, Saroomagar, Vaishalinagar, Ranga Reddy District, 500079 3. Mr.Pindi Srinivas Reddy, S/o Late Mr.Pindi pulla Reddy Aged about .64 years, Occupation Business, R/o 8-7-93/ne/19, Opp ppR Garden, pindi pulla Reddy Colony ...APPELLANTS AND 1. Mr.Khaja Fahat Hussain, S/o Khaja Shakir Hussain R/o H.No. 12-13-98, Tarnaka, Secunderabad. 2. Mrs.Mutktharunnisa, W/o Late Khaja Nazir Hussain R/o H.No. 12'13-gB, Tarnaka, Secunderabad. 3. Khaja Wajid Hussain, S/o Khaja Nazir Jussain R/o H.No. 12-13-98, Tarnaka, Secunderabad- 4. Mohd. Ameen, S/o Khaja Nazir R/o H.No. 12-13-98, Tarnaka, Secunderabad 5. Mir Sattar Ali, S/o Late Mir Sadath Ali R/o H.No. 12-13-98, Tarnaka, Secunderabad.

6. Mir Hameed Ali, S/o Late Mir Sadath Ali Rl/o H.No. 12-13-98, Tarnaka, Secunderabad 7. Mir Muzzamil Ali, S/o Late Mir Razack Ali R/o H.No 12-13-98, Tarnaka, Secunderabad 8. Mir Dastagir AIi, S/o Late Mir lftekhar Ali R/o HNo 12-13-98 Tarnaka Secunderabad ...RESPONDENTS/WRIT PETITIONERS 9. Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District At Hyderabad 10. Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad East Division Malakunta Gosha Mahal Hyderabad 11.Tadeti Sai Reddy, S/o Venkat Ram Reddy R/o Bairamalguda Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District '12. Edulakanti Narsimha Reddy, s/o narsis Reddy R/o Bairamalguda Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 13. G Ram Reddy, S/o Narsi Reddy Rio Bairamalguda Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 14. Chakali Venkaiah, S/o Agaiah Rio Karmanghat village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 15.P Ramanand Guptha, S/o Gunnaiah Gupta R/o Saroornagar village Mandal RR District '16.W Raju, S/o Tirupathi Raju Rio Bairam alguda village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District '17. Smt Devamma @ Devakamma, Wo Satyanarayana Reddy R/o 18. T. Ramanand guptha, S/o Gunnaiah Guptha R/o Karmanghat village,Saroornagar Mandal, R.R. District. '19. Gajasimha Rao, S/o Anantha Kishan Rao Rio Karmanghat village, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R. District. 20. Devamma@ Devakamma, Wo Satyanarayana Reddy, R/o Karmanghat village, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R. District. 21. Edulakanti Bal Reddy, S/o Narsi Reddy, R/o Bairarnalguda village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

22. Edulakanti Lachma Reddy, So Narsa Reddy R/o Bairam alguda village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 23. G. Ram Reddy, S/o Narsi Reddy R/o Karmanghat village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distriit. 24. Darsi Laxma Reddy, S/o Malla Reddy, Rio Sultan valva village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 25. Sama Yad Reddy, S/o Mutha Reddy R/o Champapet village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 26. Sama Bal Reddy, Sio Seetha Reddy. R/o Champapet village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 27.Sama Kista Reddy, So Yella Reddy R/o Champapet village. Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 28. Sama Rami Reddy, S/o Bal Reddy R/o Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 29. Seethamma, W/o Yella Reddy R/o Bairam alguda village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District . 30.Eluventi Anji Reddy, S/o Kistaiah R/o Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 31. Elimineti Anji Reddy, S/o Kistaiah R/o Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 32. Elimineti Rama Reddy, S/o Kistaiah Rio Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 33. Elimineti Buchi Reddy, S/o Janga Reddy Rio Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy Diskict 34.Vennu Prathap Reddy, S/o Yella Reddy Rio Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 35.Vennu Prathap Reddy, S/o Yella Reddy Rio Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District

36. Jakka Balamma, Wo late Badaru Shivaiah Rio Champapet village Saroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy Dist Dismissed For Defaulty Against RR 11 To 29, 32, 34, To 36 37.T Pradeep Kumar, S/o Late T Ramanath Guptlia Aged about 70 years Occ Business and Agriculture Rio Karmanghat Siroornagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District 38.T Vidya Bhushan, s/o Late TRamanath Guptha Aged about 67 years occ Business and Agriculture Rio Karmanghi Saroornagar Manal Ranga Reddy District 39.T Virupaksha, S/o Late T Rarnanath Guptha Aged about 67 years occ Business and Agriculture Rio Karmanghit Saroornagar Manal Ranga Reddy District RR 37 to 39 implead as per CO dt 13.09.2023 lA No I of 2022 40. Koyalakonda Sudhakar, S/o Late K Sathaiah Aged about 60 years Occ Business R/o PNo 549 Vaidehi Nagar Opp Allahabad Bank Saheb Nagar Kalan Vanasthalipuram Ranga Reddy District RR 40 implead as per CO dt21.02.2025lA No 1 ol 2025 41. Koyalakonda Ravinder Kumar, So Late K Babaiah Aged about 55 years Occ PvtEmployee R/o HNo 8-1-238 Old Karmanaghat Village Near Gandhi Statue Saroornagar Ranga Reddy District 42. Koyalakonda Raj Kumar, S/o Late K Babaiah Aged about 45 years Occ PvtEmployee R/o HNo 8-1-238 Old Karmanaghat Village Near Gandhi Statue Saroornagar Ranga Reddy District 43. Koyalakonda Mahender Kumar, S/o Late K Babaiah Aged about 55 years Occ PvtEmployee R/o HNo 8-1-238 Old Karmanaghat Village Near Gandhi Statue Saroornagar Ranga Reddy District

44. Koyalakonda DevRaj, S/o Late K Ramulu Aged pbout 45 years Occ GovtEmployee R/o HNo 8-1-235 Old Karmanaghat Village Near Gandhi Statue Saroornagar Ranga Reddy District RR 41 to 44 implead as per CO dt 04122025 lA No 2 of 2022 Respondents Nos 11 to 44 are not necessary parties ...RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 4OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated 27 -02-2026 in WP.No.'1 1087 of 2004- to the extent of setting aside the Occupancy Right Certificate issued to Late Mr.Pindi Pulla Reddy in respect to Acres 03-00 Gts in Sy.No.18 of Karmanghat Village vide proceedings dated 10-12-1979 in Proc No E1336197.. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI VIVEK JAIN FOR SRI SAMHITHA NIMMALA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 8: SRI SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.9&10: SRI MURALIDHAR REDDY KATRAM, GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.11 lo 44: - - -The Court made the following; JUDGMENT HIGH COURT F sTATE O F GANA AT HYDE THE HON1BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON'BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.642 oF 2026 DATE: 1 7.o7.2026 Between: Mr. Pindi Narsimha Reddy and two othcrs Appellants And Mr Khaja Fahat Flussain and 43 others Responden ts \,1r. Vivek Jain, icarncd

appca-ng counsr,l . cprcscnting Ms Samhirha Njmmala, learned counsel lor thc appcllanLs. \4r. Srint,,asa Rar.: porlur.r. iearn(,d coLrnsel appcarlng lor the respondent Nos. l g Vr. Muralrdhar Rcdd-! l\..rJm,. tn, appea rcorn, d Covcrnment pleadcr [or Revcn ue ng lo. the respono(nt 1g \os o 6no JUDGMENT: (Per tlon blc Justrce Moushumi Bhattacharya) 1. The Writ Appeai has been lilcd against an order dated 27 .02.2026 passed b.v- a learned Single Judge of this Court, allowing W.p.No.I lOgT ol 2OO4 liled by the respondent Nos.l g herein, secking a Writ of Certiorari and to quash a Common Order dated 03.03 2004 passed by the Joint Collecror, Ranga Reddl' District, in several Appeal Cascs, whereby the Joint Collcctor conlirmr:d the Occupanc,r, Rights grantcd in favour ol tht' nrspondct-rIs b.' tht' Rcvcnue Divisional Officer, East Division. Ranga Rcddr District. 2. 'l'he erppcllants are the sons and legal representatives ol the respondcnt Nrr. 13 in thc Writ Petition 3. Bv thc impugncd order dated 27 .02.2026, the learned Single,luclge alloucd the WriL PcLjtion br, qLrashing thc Contmon Order clated 03.03.2001 passed br the Joint Coilector. Ranga Reddl DistricL. and bl sctting aslde thc orders of lhe Revenue Divisional Ollicer. trast Ili.. isron. Rang:r llcdclr' DistricL ('ltDO) granting Ocr:upancv Righr Ccrtificates (OIiCs) rn favour of thc r''spondenr \os..l .1J tirer.irr.

4. The leirrnecl Sinlllc ,JLrdge also rcmandcd the mattcr to thc RI)O to concluct a frcsh cnquin anci drspose r,l tht' mattcr in accordance ,.r'ith 1au'. altcr issuing noti(--es :.o all thc u-ril p('titioners (, he lcqal hcirs ol thc original inamdtrr), as u.ell as tcr thc private respondents. and alfording thenr a reasonable opportr-rni[v of bcing ]'rearc1. Thc RDO u,trs further directed to rt'cord specilic lindings on all jurisdictional iacts, including posscssron as on 0 1 I 1 1973, and to ('ompl( te lhc r:xcrcise rr ithin six rnontl'rs from the dzrte o1 rcc(-.ipl ol a copl of the in.rpugned o:-clcr. J 5. Learned counsei appearing for lhe appellants submits that the proceedings before the RDO attained finality in 2008 upon deletion of thc u.rit petilioners' holding and in vierv of the lailure oi thc u,rit pcritioncrs/legal heirs of the original inamdar to question the said dcletion procecdings. Counsel furlher submits that the respondent No. I3 in rhc Writ Petition (the lather of thc writ appellants) passed a\.\,'ay on 04.09. 1991, which ought to have becn takcn into considcration by the learned Single .Judge as a fundamental defect in granting any relief against thc respondent No. 13. 6. The respondcnt Nos. I 8 (writ petitioners) are represented

7. After hearing lcarncd counscl appcarlng for the partics and considcring the fact that the learned Single Judge has directed the RDO ro arrive at a final decision onl1. after issuing notice and affording a sufficient opportunity of being heard to all the concerned parties, we deem it fit to disposc of the Wnt Appeal by drrecting thc RDO to specifically consider the submissions made b1'' the appellants on behalf of the respondent No.13 in the Writ Petition, rvith regard to the failure ol writ petitioncrs/lcgai heirs of the original inamdar to challenge the delction ol holdings rn 2008 and the disputed questions having attaincd finalitf in 2008 itsel[. The RDO shall -+

also take into consideralion the fact that the respondent No 13 in the Writ Petrlion (the father of the appellants) passed awav in lggl.u,hereasthewrltPetitionrt.asliledin2004seekingrelief against several respondents, including the responrlent No 13' impugne d Common Orcier dated 27 02 2026 8. Since the r'u'e deem has bcen challcngeci b-r rlal ol the prcsent Writ Appcal' it appropriale to extend the tlme granted b1' the learned Single Judge to the RDO to dispose of the matter' The RDO shall dispose of rhc miitter n irhrn stx months frorn thc date of reccipt ol a copy of this order' Needless to sa)', an'u' sL(rps taken up b]-anr authoriLl . including the RDO, in relation to the subject matter of disputc, shall remain stayed until the matter is finally drsposed of br rhe RDO bi passing a rcasoncd order, as directed by Lhe learnecl Srnglc Judge. connected 9. W.A.No 642 of 2026, along all "r'ith Lhe above app[cations, rs accordrngll disposed of tn lerms of There shall bc no ordcr as to costs. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO Sd/.NAYANI DEPUTY REGISTRAR ,/TRUE COPY// SECTI ON OFFICER To, 1 The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy' District At Hyderabad 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Hyderabad East Division Malakunta Gosha Mahal HYderabad 3. One CC to SRt SAMHTTHA N|MMALA, Advocate tOpUCl 4. One CC to SRt SRTNIVASA RAO PUTLUR|, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two ccs to GP FoR REVENUE, High court for the state of rerangana at Hyderabad . [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies PMK HIGH COURT CC TODAY

DATED: 1710712026 HE ST414:JUDGMENT 1 WA.No.642 ot 2026 ?) .P 2!i?6 I 17.t!!r / :,/ {. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS q 'iL 1 \:J.