IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.9873 OF 2026 DATE : 06.07.2026 Between : Alampally Laxmaiah and others …Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 And The State of Telangana, Through Nawabpet P.S. Vikarabad District, Rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. … Respondent/Complainant : ORDER : This Criminal Petition is filed praying this Court to enlarge the petitioners on bail who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 3 in FIR No.66 of 2026 of Nawabpet Police Station, Vikarabad District. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 332(b), 329(4), 324(4), 118(1) r/w 3(5) of the BNS. 2. The facts of the case are that, on 02.06.2026, the de-facto complainant lodged a report before the police stating that, on 02-2

06-2026 at about 02:30 hours, while he and his family members were sleeping inside their house after locking the doors their coparcener i.e. Accused Nos. 1 to 3 with previous grudges, came to the complainant house along with others with an intention to kill him. They trespassed into the house by force while carrying wooden stick sprinkler pipes and iron pipes. After entering the house, they questioned the complainant saying, "Today you are alone" where is your younger brother and assaulted him indiscriminately with wooden stick, sprinkler pipes and Iron Pipes. They also threatened him, stating that they would kill him and his family members. Due to assault, the complainant sustained bleeding injuries on his body. After threatening to kill one of the family members the accused persons left the place. As it was night time and out of fear, the complainant and his wife remained inside the house. On the same day i.e., on 02-06-2026, the accused persons went to the house of the complainant sister in law, which is adjacent to the complainant house. The accused persons questioned her regarding the previous night incident. Abused her, and assaulted her physically. Thereafter the complainant came to know that the same accused person went to the house of paternal uncle, Alampalli Mallaiah situated at a short distance from his residence, broke open the door of his house, and assaulted him as well. Hence, requested the police to take necessary action against 3

the petitioners basing on which police registered the case against the petitioners for the above offences. 3. Heard Sri Gajanand Chakravarthy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent - State. 4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners are innocent of the said allegations and due to the property disputes, the petitioners herein are falsely implicated in the present case and the material part of the investigation was already completed and the injuries sustained by the complainant are simple injuries. Hence, he prayed this Court to grant regular bail to the petitioners. 5. On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail stating that the allegations against the petitioners herein are serious in nature and the petitioners herein are involved in two crimes on the same day. Further, the investigation is not yet completed, as such, at this stage, the petitioners are not entitled for bail. Hence, prayed this Court to dismiss this petition. 6. Considering the submissions made by both the counsel and the material on record, the petitioners herein are in jail from 4

06.06.2026. As seen from the remand case diary, the prosecution witnesses, LWs 1 to 11 have already been examined. Further, the injury certificate shows the simple injuries. Considering the allegations against the petitioners and the period of their incarceration, this Court deems it fit to grant regular bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioners shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- each (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Vikarabad. ii. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned SHO between 09.00 a.m and 5.00 p.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required. iii. The petitioners shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS). 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 06.07.2026 TU 5 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.9873 OF 2026 Date: 06.07.2026 TU

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.9873 OF 2026 DATE : 06.07.2026 Between : Alampally Laxmaiah and others …Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 And The State of Telangana, Through Nawabpet P.S. Vikarabad District, Rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. … Respondent/Complainant : ORDER : This Criminal Petition is filed praying this Court to enlarge the petitioners on bail who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 3 in FIR No.66 of 2026 of Nawabpet Police Station, Vikarabad District. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 332(b), 329(4), 324(4), 118(1) r/w 3(5) of the BNS. 2. The facts of the case are that, on 02.06.2026, the de-facto complainant lodged a report before the police stating that, on 02-2

06-2026 at about 02:30 hours, while he and his family members were sleeping inside their house after locking the doors their coparcener i.e. Accused Nos. 1 to 3 with previous grudges, came to the complainant house along with others with an intention to kill him. They trespassed into the house by force while carrying wooden stick sprinkler pipes and iron pipes. After entering the house, they questioned the complainant saying, "Today you are alone" where is your younger brother and assaulted him indiscriminately with wooden stick, sprinkler pipes and Iron Pipes. They also threatened him, stating that they would kill him and his family members. Due to assault, the complainant sustained bleeding injuries on his body. After threatening to kill one of the family members the accused persons left the place. As it was night time and out of fear, the complainant and his wife remained inside the house. On the same day i.e., on 02-06-2026, the accused persons went to the house of the complainant sister in law, which is adjacent to the complainant house. The accused persons questioned her regarding the previous night incident. Abused her, and assaulted her physically. Thereafter the complainant came to know that the same accused person went to the house of paternal uncle, Alampalli Mallaiah situated at a short distance from his residence, broke open the door of his house, and assaulted him as well. Hence, requested the police to take necessary action against 3

the petitioners basing on which police registered the case against the petitioners for the above offences. 3. Heard Sri Gajanand Chakravarthy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent - State. 4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners are innocent of the said allegations and due to the property disputes, the petitioners herein are falsely implicated in the present case and the material part of the investigation was already completed and the injuries sustained by the complainant are simple injuries. Hence, he prayed this Court to grant regular bail to the petitioners. 5. On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail stating that the allegations against the petitioners herein are serious in nature and the petitioners herein are involved in two crimes on the same day. Further, the investigation is not yet completed, as such, at this stage, the petitioners are not entitled for bail. Hence, prayed this Court to dismiss this petition. 6. Considering the submissions made by both the counsel and the material on record, the petitioners herein are in jail from 4

06.06.2026. As seen from the remand case diary, the prosecution witnesses, LWs 1 to 11 have already been examined. Further, the injury certificate shows the simple injuries. Considering the allegations against the petitioners and the period of their incarceration, this Court deems it fit to grant regular bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioners shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- each (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Vikarabad. ii. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned SHO between 09.00 a.m and 5.00 p.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required. iii. The petitioners shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS). 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 06.07.2026 TU 5 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.9873 OF 2026 Date: 06.07.2026 TU