Telangana High Court
Yaser UI man v. The State of Telangana
WP/18956/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-06-24
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- T. Madhavi Devi
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
[ 321e ] tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MAOHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: '18956 OF 2026 Between: Yaser Ul man, S/o: Khaisar Ul lman, Aged about 21 years, Occ:Student' Kurmaguda, Saidabad, Hyderabad, Telangana - Rl/o H.No.17-9 -173tDt1 , 500059. ...PETITIONER AND Principal Secretary to 1. The State of Telangana, represented by its Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad' Hyderabad city Police commissionerate, 2. The commissioner of Police,, Hyderabad. 3. The Station House Officer, Lalaguda Police Station, Hyderabad' ,..RESPONDENTS
the Petition under Article 226 ol lhe constitution of lndia praying that in circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased Mandamus,to issue a writ, order, more particularly one in the nature of writ of declaring the action of the respondents, particularly Respondent No.3 and other in repeatedly calling thepolice officials of Lalaguda Police Station, Hyderabad, petitioner to the police station, making him and his parents sit for long hours without registering any FlR, without issuing any notice under law and without following due process, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner except by following due process of law' l.A. NO: 1 oF 2026 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents, particularly Respondent No.3 and his subordinates, not to call the petitioner to the porice station, harass, detain, or interfere with the personar riberty of the petitioner in any manner except by folowing the due process of raw and in accordance with the provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha sanhita, 2023, pending disposal of the above Writ petition. Counsel for the Fetitioner: SRI MD FASIUDDIN Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER
AIE=T!'@ruEEE3DU IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAI) THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI W.P.NO. 18956 0F 2026 DATED: 24.06.2026 Between Yaser Ul Im an. . . . Petitioner And The State ofTelangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary to Govemment, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and Two Others. . . . Respondents ORDER This writ petition is filed alleging interference by respondent No.3 into peaceful liberty of the petitioner by calling the petitioner to the police station and making him and his parents to sit for long hours without registering any FIR. this Court had directed 2. Vide orders dated 19.06.2026, the respondents not to call the petitioner to the police station without there being any justifiable cause as in interim measure' Pleader for Home, 3. Leamed Assistant Govemment sonsht further time to set instructions. llrr-t 2 petitioner appearing 4. However, learned counsel for the virtually submitted that the petitioner has been informed that an FIR in Crime No.25712026 was registered on 14.06.2026 and he submitted that the charges in the said FIR do not prescribe punishment of more than seven years and he therelbre, requested that the respondents be directed to issue notices under Section 35(3) of the BNSS and the petitioner be permitted to submit his explanation.
5. In view of the above, if the crime is registered against the petitioner as stated by the petitioner and if the punishment prescribes the charges leveled against the petitioner is less than seven years, the respondents shall issue notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS and after the petitioner submits his explanation, the respondents shall take action strictly in accordance with law and if there are any other offences registered against the petitioner, the respondents are at liberty to take action in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. :<e *f ;G;|,1,:*rr.E.;:i:,' 3 7. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. SD/- A.H.S.GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /ITRUE COPY// G SECTION OFFICER To, Government, Home Department, secretariat, The 1 . The Principal secretary to State of Telangana, HYderabad. commissionerate, 2. The commissioner of Police,, Hyderabad city Police Hyderabad. 3. The Station House Officer, Lalaguda Police Station, Hyderabad' 4. One CC to Sri MD Fasiuddin, Advocate [OPUC] 5.TwoCCstoGPforHome,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana'at Hyderabad [OUT] 6. Two CD CoPies TJ TKS @_ HIGH COURT CC TODAY DATED: 2410612026 A t"t- ZJ,s1t'r: S) x ia |,, ,o t,,., 0 1 JUL 2026 a \lr. * \. .-rt.i'- l) ORDER WP.No.18956 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ( q ot