[ 321e I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE NruO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX I PRESENT THE HONOURABLIE SMT" JU$TICE T.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITIONI NO: 19639 OF 2026 Between 1. Poddaturi Rangaiah, S/o. Poddaturi Bakkaiah, Aged 72 Years, Occupation. Business, Resident of Flat No-101, B-Block, Srinath Residency. Shivaji Nagar, Secunderabad-500003. 2. Poddaturi Eshwar, S/o. Poddaturi Rangaiah, Aged 33 Years, Occupation. Private Employee, Resident of Flat No-101, B-Block, Srinath Residency. Shivaji Nagar, Secunderabad-500003. 3. Poddaturi Akshay, S/o, Poddaturi Rangaiah, Aged 31 Years, Occupation. Private Employee, Petitioner Nos. 1,2 and 3 are Resident of Flat No-101, B-Block, Srinath Residency. Shivaji Nagar, Secunderabad-S0O0O3. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad District, Telangana. 3. The Station House Officer, Market Police Station, Hyderabad Commissionerate, Telangana. 4. M/s. Srinath Housing Construction and Developers, Represented by Managing Partners, Sourab Kumar Rawal, S/o. Suresh Rawal, Aged 30 years, Occupation. Business, Rl/o. 8-1-222,8-1-22211 lo 2225, Pent House, Block A, Srinath Residency, Shivajai Nagar, RP.Road, Secunderabad-500003.

5. M/s. Srinath Housing Construction and Developers, Represented by Managing Partners, R.Akshit Jain gundesh, S/o. Rajesh Kumar, Aged 31 years, Occupation. Business, R/o. Flat No. 502, Matta Mansion, West Manedpally, Secunderabad-500026. .RESPONDENTS the Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus Directing Respondent No.3 Not to interfere in Civil Dispute, unless due Process of law l.A. t''{O: 1 OF 2026 Petition underSection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of rlhe petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct Respondent No.3 to Stay on all further proceedings against the Petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI DARVESH ANISHWAR Gounsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : -" The Court made the following: ORDER s{rEt.E*rrSj.lrwnsgl, IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELI\NGANA AT ITYDERABAI) THE HON'BLE SMT. JI,STICE T. ITIADHAVI DTVI No.1 Between: Poddaturi Rangaiah & 2 others Petitioners AND The State of Telangana and 4 others ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioners seeking a direction to disputes between the respondent No.3 not to interfere in the civil petitioners and respondent Nos.4 & 5.

2. Heard Mr.Darvesh Anishwar, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents No.1to 3. claim to be the land owners while respondents No.4 3. The petitioners and 5 are the d.evelopers of the property. It is submitted that there is a dispute with regard to allotment of d'eveloped area by respondents No'4 I Iti and 5 in favour of the petitioners. It is alleged that the 3'd respondent is tryrng to settle the matter' \ interfering in the civil dispute and is \ Therefore, this writ petition is filed. 4. Learned Assistant Government pleader for Home appearing for - respondents No.l to 3 sought time to get instructions as to whether any crime has been registered against the petitioners. police 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, prayed that the be directed to follow the due process of law and not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. 6. Having regard of the above submissions, this Court deems it Iit and proper to dispose of the writ petition at the admission stage with a direction to the respondents i.e., respondent No.3 not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondents No.4 and 5 without there being a complaint against the petitioners and if there is an FIR registered against the petitioners, he shall strictly follow the due process of law.

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. SD/- T. SRIN]VASA RED ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principle secretary, Home Department, secretariat, The state of Telangana, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of police, Hyderabad District, Telangana. 3. The Station House Officer, Market police Station, Hyderabad Commissionerate, Telangana. 4. One CC to SRI DARVESH AN|SHWAR, Advocate tOpUCI 5. Two CCs to Gp FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies TP P\/L CC.TODAYHIGH COURT DATED | 2410612026 1 H E S TA 14: oC) 2 9,'UitORDER 2020 * *!,VP,N0.19639 of 2026 Y\TC,l DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 6 lo.* e1

[ 321e I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE NruO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX I PRESENT THE HONOURABLIE SMT" JU$TICE T.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITIONI NO: 19639 OF 2026 Between 1. Poddaturi Rangaiah, S/o. Poddaturi Bakkaiah, Aged 72 Years, Occupation. Business, Resident of Flat No-101, B-Block, Srinath Residency. Shivaji Nagar, Secunderabad-500003. 2. Poddaturi Eshwar, S/o. Poddaturi Rangaiah, Aged 33 Years, Occupation. Private Employee, Resident of Flat No-101, B-Block, Srinath Residency. Shivaji Nagar, Secunderabad-500003. 3. Poddaturi Akshay, S/o, Poddaturi Rangaiah, Aged 31 Years, Occupation. Private Employee, Petitioner Nos. 1,2 and 3 are Resident of Flat No-101, B-Block, Srinath Residency. Shivaji Nagar, Secunderabad-S0O0O3. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad District, Telangana. 3. The Station House Officer, Market Police Station, Hyderabad Commissionerate, Telangana. 4. M/s. Srinath Housing Construction and Developers, Represented by Managing Partners, Sourab Kumar Rawal, S/o. Suresh Rawal, Aged 30 years, Occupation. Business, Rl/o. 8-1-222,8-1-22211 lo 2225, Pent House, Block A, Srinath Residency, Shivajai Nagar, RP.Road, Secunderabad-500003.

5. M/s. Srinath Housing Construction and Developers, Represented by Managing Partners, R.Akshit Jain gundesh, S/o. Rajesh Kumar, Aged 31 years, Occupation. Business, R/o. Flat No. 502, Matta Mansion, West Manedpally, Secunderabad-500026. .RESPONDENTS the Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus Directing Respondent No.3 Not to interfere in Civil Dispute, unless due Process of law l.A. t''{O: 1 OF 2026 Petition underSection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of rlhe petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct Respondent No.3 to Stay on all further proceedings against the Petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI DARVESH ANISHWAR Gounsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : -" The Court made the following: ORDER s{rEt.E*rrSj.lrwnsgl, IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELI\NGANA AT ITYDERABAI) THE HON'BLE SMT. JI,STICE T. ITIADHAVI DTVI No.1 Between: Poddaturi Rangaiah & 2 others Petitioners AND The State of Telangana and 4 others ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioners seeking a direction to disputes between the respondent No.3 not to interfere in the civil petitioners and respondent Nos.4 & 5.

2. Heard Mr.Darvesh Anishwar, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents No.1to 3. claim to be the land owners while respondents No.4 3. The petitioners and 5 are the d.evelopers of the property. It is submitted that there is a dispute with regard to allotment of d'eveloped area by respondents No'4 I Iti and 5 in favour of the petitioners. It is alleged that the 3'd respondent is tryrng to settle the matter' \ interfering in the civil dispute and is \ Therefore, this writ petition is filed. 4. Learned Assistant Government pleader for Home appearing for - respondents No.l to 3 sought time to get instructions as to whether any crime has been registered against the petitioners. police 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, prayed that the be directed to follow the due process of law and not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. 6. Having regard of the above submissions, this Court deems it Iit and proper to dispose of the writ petition at the admission stage with a direction to the respondents i.e., respondent No.3 not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondents No.4 and 5 without there being a complaint against the petitioners and if there is an FIR registered against the petitioners, he shall strictly follow the due process of law.

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. SD/- T. SRIN]VASA RED ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principle secretary, Home Department, secretariat, The state of Telangana, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of police, Hyderabad District, Telangana. 3. The Station House Officer, Market police Station, Hyderabad Commissionerate, Telangana. 4. One CC to SRI DARVESH AN|SHWAR, Advocate tOpUCI 5. Two CCs to Gp FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies TP P\/L CC.TODAYHIGH COURT DATED | 2410612026 1 H E S TA 14: oC) 2 9,'UitORDER 2020 * *!,VP,N0.19639 of 2026 Y\TC,l DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 6 lo.* e1