132521 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1775 OF 2026 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 1 2 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein for willfully disobeying the Orders of the High Courtdated 23.06.2025 passed inW.P.No.30'l 18 of 2022. Between: K. Kondal Rao, S/o. Late Rama Rao, Aged 79 years, Occ. Retd. DSP (Police Dept.,), R/o. Subha Aditya Residency Apartment, LIC Colony, Srinagar Colony Hyderabad. ...Petitioner AND 1. Dr. A. Narendra Kumar, S/o. & Age not known to the Petitioner, Occ. Director of Medical Education, Sultan Bazar, Koti, Hyderabad. ... RespondenUR2 in WP 2. CV. Anand (lPS), S/o and Age not known to the Petitioner, Occ. Special Chief Secretary to the Govt., Home Dept., Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad. (2nd Respondent is not party to the WP, but however the 2nd Respondent is Sanctioning Authority, hence he made as Proposed Party Respondent and necessary to the CC) ...Respondents/Proposed Respondent l.A. NO: 1OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that.in the circumstances stated in the affidavit flled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the Petitioner to rmplead the 2nd Respondent as Party Respondent in the present Contempt Case (who is not Original Party Respondent in WP), which is filed against the non implementation of the Orders passed in W.P.No.30118 of 2022, dl. 23.06.2025 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. BIDARKAR GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Gp For Services I The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA ONTEMP SEN 5of2 Dated : 23.O6.2O26 Between K. Kondal Rao ,.,. Petitioner AND Dr. A. Narendra Kumar and another ... Respondents OR ER: Heard Sri Bidarkar Gopal, appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Government pleader for Services-f, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. This Contempt Case is filed complaining violation of the order of this Court dated 23.06.2025 passed in W.p. No.3p118 of 2022. 3. The relevant oortion of the Judqmentof this Court dated 3.06.2025 passed in W,P. No. 3O 118 of 2022 is extracted here nder: 2 cc 1115 2026

"The writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to put forth the petitioner's grievance as put forth in the present writ petition as well as petitioner's representation dated 26,O7,2O2L addressed to the Telangana State Medical Council, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad afresh through a representation addressed to the 2nd respondent, seeking reconsideration of petitioner's reimbursement claim of Rs.5,84,6O9/- out of which 2nd respondent had only sanctioned Rs.1,OO,OOO/- and for release of balance amount of Rs.4,84,6O9l- as per petitioner's legal entitlement as per G.O.Ms.No.97, dated 07,06,2OL7, within a period of one ( 1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and 2ndupon the petitioner approaching the respondent herein seeking disbursement of the balance claim of Rs.4,84,6O91- for the medical expenses incurred by the petitioner for the treatment of the petitioner's wife for Pan Colonic Diverticulosis as per G.O.Ms.No.g7, dated 07,O6,2OL7 and upon the 2nd respondent receiving the said representation the respondent No.2 shall consider the same as per G.O.Ms.No.g7, dated 07,O6,2Ot7 and pass appropriate orders v,rith one ( 1) week thereafter and duly communicate the decision on the said representation to the petitioner herein. However, there shall be no order as to costs". 3 t'7'7 5 2026 cc

Assistant Government Pleader for4. The learned 2Services-I, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and brings on record the Proceedings vide Rc.No'52633/l'1A-C/ Medical2024, dated 21.04.2026 of the Director of Education, Government of Telangana, Koti, Hyderabad and contends that the order of this Court dated 23.06.2025 passed in W.P. No.30118 of 2022 had been duly complied with. Hence, Contempt Case needs to be closed. proceedings dated perusal of the said5. A bare 21.04.2026 indicates that in pursuance to the order of this Court dated 23.06.2025 passed in W.P. No.30118 of 2022, the petitioner made a representation dated 03.07.2025 tor 2ndreimbursement claim of Rs,5,84,609/- out of which respondent had sanctioned Rs.1,00,000/- only and for release of balance amount of Rs.4,84,609/-, the Director of Koti, Medical Education, Government of Telangana, Parent Hyderabad advised the petitioner to approach his claim Department to forward his grievances for balance amount before the Standing Committee vide office letter Rc.No. Spl/M A.C/2025, dated 11.08.2025 and the petitioner 4 cc t7'15 2026 dulyhad also made representation dated 23'09'20b datedacknowledging the receipt of the said letter f 1.08.2025 and therefore, this Court opines it is incorrect to state that the orders of this Court had not been complied with. 6 Takino into onsider tion circumstances of (a) The aforesaid facts and the case,

learned (b) The submissions made by the andcounsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner the learned Assistant Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of respondents, dated 23.06'2025 (c) The order of this Court passed in W.P. No. 30118 ol 2022, (d) The contents of the proceedings vide Rc'No' 52633/MA-C/2024, dated 21'04.2026 issued by the Telangana, Director of Medical Education, Govt. of Koti, Hyderabad, the (e) The admitted fact that, pursuant to orders of this Court dated 23,06.2025 passed in W'P' a No.30118 of 2022, the petitioner submitted 5 cc n15 2026 petitioner'srepresentation seeking redressa! of grievance, The said representation was duly considered by the competent authority and was disposed of vide Rc.No.Spl/MA.C/2025, dated 11.08.2O25, wherein the petitioner was informed I that 2"d respondent had sanctioned Rs.1,OO,OOO/-only and the petitioner was further advised to approach his parent department for claiming the balance amount, payable to him, This Court opines that there is no contempt as alleged by the petitioner and it is open to the petitioner to avail the remedies as are available to the petitioner pertaining to the final orders vide Proceedings Rc.No.52633/ MA-C12024, dated 2L.O4.2O26 issued to the petitioner by the Director of Medical Education, Government of Telangana, Koti, Hyderabad in compliance to the directions of this Court dated 23.06.2025 passed in w.P. No.30118 of 2022.

There7. Accordingly the Contempt Case is closed. shall be no order as to costs. 6 tac t7'75 2026 Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/. A.V.S. PRASAD DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// *----7 sEc ION OFFIGERTo, 1 Two CCs to GP for Services-|, H.igh Court of Telangana at Hyderabad -- - - [OUT] 2 One CC to Sri. Bidarkar Gopal, Aivocate tOpUq 3 Two CD Copies GNl(ba HIGH COURT DATED: 2310612026 o f TEL (' t ORDER Ur .r$ + JI it CC.No.1775 of 2026 eo _s Hsltl a CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS 6 0

132521 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1775 OF 2026 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 1 2 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein for willfully disobeying the Orders of the High Courtdated 23.06.2025 passed inW.P.No.30'l 18 of 2022. Between: K. Kondal Rao, S/o. Late Rama Rao, Aged 79 years, Occ. Retd. DSP (Police Dept.,), R/o. Subha Aditya Residency Apartment, LIC Colony, Srinagar Colony Hyderabad. ...Petitioner AND 1. Dr. A. Narendra Kumar, S/o. & Age not known to the Petitioner, Occ. Director of Medical Education, Sultan Bazar, Koti, Hyderabad. ... RespondenUR2 in WP 2. CV. Anand (lPS), S/o and Age not known to the Petitioner, Occ. Special Chief Secretary to the Govt., Home Dept., Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad. (2nd Respondent is not party to the WP, but however the 2nd Respondent is Sanctioning Authority, hence he made as Proposed Party Respondent and necessary to the CC) ...Respondents/Proposed Respondent l.A. NO: 1OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that.in the circumstances stated in the affidavit flled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the Petitioner to rmplead the 2nd Respondent as Party Respondent in the present Contempt Case (who is not Original Party Respondent in WP), which is filed against the non implementation of the Orders passed in W.P.No.30118 of 2022, dl. 23.06.2025 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. BIDARKAR GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Gp For Services I The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA ONTEMP SEN 5of2 Dated : 23.O6.2O26 Between K. Kondal Rao ,.,. Petitioner AND Dr. A. Narendra Kumar and another ... Respondents OR ER: Heard Sri Bidarkar Gopal, appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Government pleader for Services-f, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. This Contempt Case is filed complaining violation of the order of this Court dated 23.06.2025 passed in W.p. No.3p118 of 2022. 3. The relevant oortion of the Judqmentof this Court dated 3.06.2025 passed in W,P. No. 3O 118 of 2022 is extracted here nder: 2 cc 1115 2026

"The writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to put forth the petitioner's grievance as put forth in the present writ petition as well as petitioner's representation dated 26,O7,2O2L addressed to the Telangana State Medical Council, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad afresh through a representation addressed to the 2nd respondent, seeking reconsideration of petitioner's reimbursement claim of Rs.5,84,6O9/- out of which 2nd respondent had only sanctioned Rs.1,OO,OOO/- and for release of balance amount of Rs.4,84,6O9l- as per petitioner's legal entitlement as per G.O.Ms.No.97, dated 07,06,2OL7, within a period of one ( 1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and 2ndupon the petitioner approaching the respondent herein seeking disbursement of the balance claim of Rs.4,84,6O91- for the medical expenses incurred by the petitioner for the treatment of the petitioner's wife for Pan Colonic Diverticulosis as per G.O.Ms.No.g7, dated 07,O6,2OL7 and upon the 2nd respondent receiving the said representation the respondent No.2 shall consider the same as per G.O.Ms.No.g7, dated 07,O6,2Ot7 and pass appropriate orders v,rith one ( 1) week thereafter and duly communicate the decision on the said representation to the petitioner herein. However, there shall be no order as to costs". 3 t'7'7 5 2026 cc

Assistant Government Pleader for4. The learned 2Services-I, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and brings on record the Proceedings vide Rc.No'52633/l'1A-C/ Medical2024, dated 21.04.2026 of the Director of Education, Government of Telangana, Koti, Hyderabad and contends that the order of this Court dated 23.06.2025 passed in W.P. No.30118 of 2022 had been duly complied with. Hence, Contempt Case needs to be closed. proceedings dated perusal of the said5. A bare 21.04.2026 indicates that in pursuance to the order of this Court dated 23.06.2025 passed in W.P. No.30118 of 2022, the petitioner made a representation dated 03.07.2025 tor 2ndreimbursement claim of Rs,5,84,609/- out of which respondent had sanctioned Rs.1,00,000/- only and for release of balance amount of Rs.4,84,609/-, the Director of Koti, Medical Education, Government of Telangana, Parent Hyderabad advised the petitioner to approach his claim Department to forward his grievances for balance amount before the Standing Committee vide office letter Rc.No. Spl/M A.C/2025, dated 11.08.2025 and the petitioner 4 cc t7'15 2026 dulyhad also made representation dated 23'09'20b datedacknowledging the receipt of the said letter f 1.08.2025 and therefore, this Court opines it is incorrect to state that the orders of this Court had not been complied with. 6 Takino into onsider tion circumstances of (a) The aforesaid facts and the case,

learned (b) The submissions made by the andcounsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner the learned Assistant Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of respondents, dated 23.06'2025 (c) The order of this Court passed in W.P. No. 30118 ol 2022, (d) The contents of the proceedings vide Rc'No' 52633/MA-C/2024, dated 21'04.2026 issued by the Telangana, Director of Medical Education, Govt. of Koti, Hyderabad, the (e) The admitted fact that, pursuant to orders of this Court dated 23,06.2025 passed in W'P' a No.30118 of 2022, the petitioner submitted 5 cc n15 2026 petitioner'srepresentation seeking redressa! of grievance, The said representation was duly considered by the competent authority and was disposed of vide Rc.No.Spl/MA.C/2025, dated 11.08.2O25, wherein the petitioner was informed I that 2"d respondent had sanctioned Rs.1,OO,OOO/-only and the petitioner was further advised to approach his parent department for claiming the balance amount, payable to him, This Court opines that there is no contempt as alleged by the petitioner and it is open to the petitioner to avail the remedies as are available to the petitioner pertaining to the final orders vide Proceedings Rc.No.52633/ MA-C12024, dated 2L.O4.2O26 issued to the petitioner by the Director of Medical Education, Government of Telangana, Koti, Hyderabad in compliance to the directions of this Court dated 23.06.2025 passed in w.P. No.30118 of 2022.

There7. Accordingly the Contempt Case is closed. shall be no order as to costs. 6 tac t7'75 2026 Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/. A.V.S. PRASAD DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// *----7 sEc ION OFFIGERTo, 1 Two CCs to GP for Services-|, H.igh Court of Telangana at Hyderabad -- - - [OUT] 2 One CC to Sri. Bidarkar Gopal, Aivocate tOpUq 3 Two CD Copies GNl(ba HIGH COURT DATED: 2310612026 o f TEL (' t ORDER Ur .r$ + JI it CC.No.1775 of 2026 eo _s Hsltl a CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS 6 0