[ 3486 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 8039 0F 2026 Between: 1. Thakur Karan Singh, S/o. Shiv Ratan Singh Aged about 71 Years, Occ' Retired Employee R/o. H.No 12-1-1378. Shanthi Nagar, Near SFS School, North Lalaguda, Secunderabad. 2. Thakur Shiv Rana Prathap Singh, S/o. Thakur Karan Singh Aged about 33 Years, Occ. Private Employee R/o. H.No. 12-1-1378. Shanthi Nagar' Near SFS School, North Lalaguda, Secunderabad 1 &4 ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED AND The State of Telangana, Rep, by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused Nos. 1 and 4 hereln on Anticipatory Bail in the event 2026 On the file of P.S. Kagaznagar,of their arrest in crime. No. 77 of Kumrambheem Asifabad District, offences registered U/Sec. 420, 406, r/w 34 IPC and pass such other order or orders. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Ms. vEROSE SANJANA , Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the sole Respondent' The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF'TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO AB]I4IIYA_L_ ]ETITI AIY No.8O39 of2O26 Date 29.05.2026 Between: Thakur Karan Singh and another Petitioners AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad Re sponden t ORDER 1. This Criminal petitton is filed under Sectton 4g2 of ,BNSS,) Bharativa Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short seeking the Court to quash the proceedings against the petitioners / accused Nos. 1 and 4in Crime No.77 of 2026, on t|,e flle of Kagaznagar-To* n porice statron, Kumrambheem Asifabad, registerecl for the of'ft:nccs punishabrc under Sections 420. 406 r/w 34 ol Indian Penzri Code. 2. Heard Srr Verose Raghunath, learned Senior Counsel appearing on beharr o[ Ms. verose Sanjana, learned counsel for the petitioners/ accuSed \os. 1 and 4 as well as Sri Jitender Rao 2 SCR, J Crlp 6019 2026 Veeramalla, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1-State. petitioners has restricted3. Learned Senior Counsel for the the relief sought in the instant petition stating that a direction be issued to the Police to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 35 (3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short'BNSS').

Public4. On the other hand, the learned Additional Prosecutor would contend that several cases are registered against the petitioners. However, the said offences are not related to the offences alleged in the present case. counsel5. Considering the submissions of both the learned seen that theand the material available on record, it is allegations alleged against the petitioners are under Sections Code and the punishment42O,406 rlw 34 of Indiar Penal prescribed for the offences alleged against the petitioners is less than seven (07) years. 3 SC R. J Crlp 803t) 2026

6. In that vieu of the matter, u'ithout going into the merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioners / accused Nos,l and 4 to appear belore the Investigating Officer on or before 03.O8.2026 between 10:00 a.m and 01'00 p.m. and in turn. the Investigating Officer is directed to follos, the procedurc laid down under Section35 (3) of the BNSS (prevroush Section 4l A of Crrminal Procedure Code, 1973)' and also the guidelines formulated by the Hon'b1e Supreme Court of lndra in Arnesh Kumar v, State of Bihart scrupulousll'. Hou'ever, the petitioners/ accused Nos.1 and 4 sha,ll submit their defense and co-operate with the Investigating Officer as and u,her, required bv furnishing information and producing all re levant documents/ materiai required for the purpose of investtgatron and the Investigating Officer shal1 consider the same and complete the investigation strictly 1n accordance u'ith lau 7 . Accordingl)', the Criminal Petition is disposed of. i(2014) 8 scc 273 4 SCR, J Crlp E039 2026 8. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shal1 stand closed. "'-ot3,t='iNYA:e,8iRRI 1 \ //TRUE COPY// sEcrlo N OFFICER To, Town' Sirpur Class' '1 of First Magistrate . The.ftdiciel Kumrambheem pofi"" Kagaznagar' Stution' Otflcli, The Statlon House 2. District Asifabad to Public Prosecutor' High Court for the State of Telangana at Two CCs 3. Hvderabad (OUT) (oPUc) VenosE sANJANA Advocate 4 ljl',; #;; ils 5. Two CD CoPies TPI(/KA

HIGH COURT DATED: 2910512026 1lr€ s 14 teR t( ORDER o U P 0 6 JU|J 2026 z. CRLP.No.8039 of 2026 C). ^ t; t i) .so41.6H gO CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSING OF ?v\*

[ 3486 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 8039 0F 2026 Between: 1. Thakur Karan Singh, S/o. Shiv Ratan Singh Aged about 71 Years, Occ' Retired Employee R/o. H.No 12-1-1378. Shanthi Nagar, Near SFS School, North Lalaguda, Secunderabad. 2. Thakur Shiv Rana Prathap Singh, S/o. Thakur Karan Singh Aged about 33 Years, Occ. Private Employee R/o. H.No. 12-1-1378. Shanthi Nagar' Near SFS School, North Lalaguda, Secunderabad 1 &4 ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED AND The State of Telangana, Rep, by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused Nos. 1 and 4 hereln on Anticipatory Bail in the event 2026 On the file of P.S. Kagaznagar,of their arrest in crime. No. 77 of Kumrambheem Asifabad District, offences registered U/Sec. 420, 406, r/w 34 IPC and pass such other order or orders. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Ms. vEROSE SANJANA , Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the sole Respondent' The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF'TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO AB]I4IIYA_L_ ]ETITI AIY No.8O39 of2O26 Date 29.05.2026 Between: Thakur Karan Singh and another Petitioners AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad Re sponden t ORDER 1. This Criminal petitton is filed under Sectton 4g2 of ,BNSS,) Bharativa Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short seeking the Court to quash the proceedings against the petitioners / accused Nos. 1 and 4in Crime No.77 of 2026, on t|,e flle of Kagaznagar-To* n porice statron, Kumrambheem Asifabad, registerecl for the of'ft:nccs punishabrc under Sections 420. 406 r/w 34 ol Indian Penzri Code. 2. Heard Srr Verose Raghunath, learned Senior Counsel appearing on beharr o[ Ms. verose Sanjana, learned counsel for the petitioners/ accuSed \os. 1 and 4 as well as Sri Jitender Rao 2 SCR, J Crlp 6019 2026 Veeramalla, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1-State. petitioners has restricted3. Learned Senior Counsel for the the relief sought in the instant petition stating that a direction be issued to the Police to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 35 (3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short'BNSS').

Public4. On the other hand, the learned Additional Prosecutor would contend that several cases are registered against the petitioners. However, the said offences are not related to the offences alleged in the present case. counsel5. Considering the submissions of both the learned seen that theand the material available on record, it is allegations alleged against the petitioners are under Sections Code and the punishment42O,406 rlw 34 of Indiar Penal prescribed for the offences alleged against the petitioners is less than seven (07) years. 3 SC R. J Crlp 803t) 2026

6. In that vieu of the matter, u'ithout going into the merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioners / accused Nos,l and 4 to appear belore the Investigating Officer on or before 03.O8.2026 between 10:00 a.m and 01'00 p.m. and in turn. the Investigating Officer is directed to follos, the procedurc laid down under Section35 (3) of the BNSS (prevroush Section 4l A of Crrminal Procedure Code, 1973)' and also the guidelines formulated by the Hon'b1e Supreme Court of lndra in Arnesh Kumar v, State of Bihart scrupulousll'. Hou'ever, the petitioners/ accused Nos.1 and 4 sha,ll submit their defense and co-operate with the Investigating Officer as and u,her, required bv furnishing information and producing all re levant documents/ materiai required for the purpose of investtgatron and the Investigating Officer shal1 consider the same and complete the investigation strictly 1n accordance u'ith lau 7 . Accordingl)', the Criminal Petition is disposed of. i(2014) 8 scc 273 4 SCR, J Crlp E039 2026 8. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shal1 stand closed. "'-ot3,t='iNYA:e,8iRRI 1 \ //TRUE COPY// sEcrlo N OFFICER To, Town' Sirpur Class' '1 of First Magistrate . The.ftdiciel Kumrambheem pofi"" Kagaznagar' Stution' Otflcli, The Statlon House 2. District Asifabad to Public Prosecutor' High Court for the State of Telangana at Two CCs 3. Hvderabad (OUT) (oPUc) VenosE sANJANA Advocate 4 ljl',; #;; ils 5. Two CD CoPies TPI(/KA

HIGH COURT DATED: 2910512026 1lr€ s 14 teR t( ORDER o U P 0 6 JU|J 2026 z. CRLP.No.8039 of 2026 C). ^ t; t i) .so41.6H gO CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSING OF ?v\*