Rajasthan High Court
Dinesh Meena S/O Tej Lal Meena v. The State of Rajasthan
2026:RJ-JP:33784 · CW/15964/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-08-21
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Anuroop Singhi
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:33784] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15964/2026 CNR: RJHC020768412026 | URN: CW / 33974U / 2026 Dinesh Meena S/o Tej Lal Meena, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Meenavas, Jhopadin, Berkhera, Po Berkhera, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary To Government, Finance, Excise And Taxation Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Inspector, Genral, Registration And Stamps Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Lohagal Road, Ajmer - 305001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 21/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the petitioner has been placed under suspension vide order dated 21.02.2025 (Annexure-1) and a period of more than eighteen months have passed since then and thus, he prays that he may be granted liberty to file representation before the respondent - authorities for seeking his reinstatement in the service. 2. Considering the limited submission so made and without delving into merits of the matter, the present writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file representation [2026:RJ-JP:33784] (2 of 2) [CW-15964/2026] before the respondent - authorities, within a period of fifteen days from today.
3. In the event of any such representation being filed by the petitioner, respondent - authorities are directed to consider and decide the same, by passing a speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within thirty days thereafter. 4. Needless to say that the present order has been passed only to decide the representation as submitted by the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law, and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said representation in a particular manner. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J 7/Dipesh Chayal