Rajasthan High Court

Kanta Bairwa D/O Naval Kishor Bairwa W/O Late Manoj Kumar Bairwa v. State of Rajasthan

2026:RJ-JP:33899 · CW/696/2026

Decision date
2026-08-21
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Sameer Jain

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

[2026:RJ-JP:33899] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 696/2026 CNR: RJHC020025452026 | URN: CW / 1512U / 2026 Kanta Bairwa D/o Naval Kishor Bairwa W/o Late Manoj Kumar Bairwa, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Panchayat Reni, Tehsil Reni, Alwar, Rajasthan-301408. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary. Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Registrar, Revenue Board, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Shreeji Nagar, Prithviraj Colony, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302018. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 530/2026 CNR: RJHC020025422026 | URN: CW / 1131U / 2026 Boni Yadav D/o Pooranmal Yadav W/o Simon Yadav, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village And Post Jaisinghpura Post, Tehsil Virat Nagar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Registrar, Revenue Board, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Shreeji Nagar, Prithviraj Colony, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajathan 302018. ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harender Neel For Respondent(s) : Mr. VD Gathala, AGC Mr. Nalin G Narain [2026:RJ-JP:33899] (2 of 2) [CW-696/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment / Order 21/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the present petitions with the liberty to file fresh petition if the need so arises in future. 2. Howsoever, the respondents has raised objection to the said. They will also be at a liberty to tile appropriate response to be if liberty is utilised. 3. Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for being granted. 4. Pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J 80-81/JUBIN