Rajasthan High Court

Mukesh Sharma & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.

2026:RJ-JP:31631 · CRLMP/937/2016

Decision date
2026-08-11
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Ashok Kumar Jain

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

[2026:RJ-JP:31631] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 937/2016 CNR: RJHC020558932016 | URN: CRLMP / 1554U / 2016 1. Mukesh Sharma son of Hanuman Sahai Sharma aged about 28 years, resident of Village Keshopura, Dhani Dhankawali, Bhankrota, Ajmer, Jaipur 2. Hanuman Sahai Sharma son of Late Shri Narayan, resident of Village Keshopura, Dhani Dhankawali, Bhankrota, Ajmer, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan through PP 2. Ashok Bohra son of Hanuman Prasad Sharma, aged about 26 years resident of Village Keshopura, Dhani Dhankawali, Bhankrota, Ajmer, Jaipur ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 11/08/2026 1. None present on behalf of petitioners, even after taking up the matter in second round. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted a report received from P.S. Bhankrota, Jaipur (West). The report indicate that after investigation, police has filed a charge-sheet against Mukesh Sharma under Sections 420, 406 and 323 of IPC on 10.08.2016. 3. The report is taken on record. 4. Police has not found involvement of petitioner No. 2, Hanuman Sahai Sharma. [2026:RJ-JP:31631] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-937/2016] 5. After taking on record, the report submitted by police, no case is made out for interference by invoking jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.

6. In view of discussion made hereinabove, the misc. petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is hereby dismissed with pending application, if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J 01/GAURAV