Rajasthan High Court
Praveen Kumar S/O Dhimaram v. State of Rajasthan
2026:RJ-JP:28875 · CRLMB/11483/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-07-27
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Pramil Kumar Mathur
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:28875] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11484/2026 CNR: RJHC020684552026 | URN: CRLMB / 21184U / 2026 Sharwan Kumar Vishnoi S/o Jalaram, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Jato Ki Dhani Sesawa, Police Station Chitalvana, District Jalore Rajasthan ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11483/2026 CNR: RJHC020684502026 | URN: CRLMB / 21183U / 2026 Praveen Kumar S/o Dhimaram, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Aarva, Police Station Sarvana, District Jalore, Rajasthan ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishal Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 27/07/2026 1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.129/2026 registered at Police Station Chechat, District Kota Rural for offences under Section 19/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950. [2026:RJ-JP:28875] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11484/2026] 2. Since both these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioners is that 2,860 quarters of liquor were recovered from their conscious possession without any valid permit or licence. Petitioner Sharwan Kumar Vishnoi has been in judicial custody since 06.06.2026, while petitioner Praveen Kumar has been in judicial custody since 08.06.2026. Though one criminal antecedent has been reported against petitioner Sharwan Kumar Vishnoi, it is submitted that he has already been granted bail in the said case. The present case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail applications deserves to be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications of the petitioners. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
7. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Sharwan Kumar Vishnoi S/o Jalaram and Praveen Kumar [2026:RJ-JP:28875] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11484/2026] S/o Dhimaram, be released on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 65-66/Arun