Rajasthan High Court
Mahesh Patidar S/O Ramanlal Patidar v. State of Rajasthan
2026:RJ-JP:28483 · CRLMB/11054/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-07-23
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Pramil Kumar Mathur
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:28483] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11054/2026 CNR: RJHC020651302026 | URN: CRLMB / 20438U / 2026 Mahesh Patidar S/o Ramanlal Patidar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Bhasor, Thana Saagvada, Dist Dungarpur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shivraj Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 23/07/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.487/2024 registered at Police Station Gumanpura, District Kota City for offences under Section 309(6), 140(3) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contend that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner's role is limited to providing the vehicle that was allegedly used in the commission of the offence. He again submits that co-accused Amit Bhai has been enlarged on bail by this Court on 12.01.2026. Co-accused Kamaljeet has also got benefit of bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.03.2026. Other co-accused Rahul Gupta and Sanjeev Chopra have also [2026:RJ-JP:28483] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11054/2026] enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.08.2025. The case of the petitioner is on better footing. Petitioner is behind the bars since 15.03.2026 though one case has been reported against him, however, in that case he is already on bail. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Mahesh Patidar S/o Ramanlal Patidar, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/81