Rajasthan High Court
Kailash S/O Mohanlal v. State of Rajasthan
2026:RJ-JP:24478 · CRLMB/9237/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-07-02
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Praveer Bhatnagar
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:24478] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9237/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16952U / 2026 Kailash S/o Mohanlal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Arjunpura Police Station Jawar District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 02/07/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 41/2026 registered at Police Station Jawar, District Jhalawar for the offences under Section 8/21, 8/25 and 8/29 of NDPS Act.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated for the offence under Section 8/21 read with Section 8/29 of NDPS Act. It is further contended that recovery of smack weighing 6.05 grams and 7.20 grams is effected from other co-accused Madan and Chandrapraksh respectively, is below commercial quantity. The petitioner is behind bars since 28.04.2026 and in a criminal antecedent which is shown against the petitioner under Section [2026:RJ-JP:24478] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9237/2026] 4/25 of Arms Act, in that case, the petitioner is acquitted. It is further contended that charge-seet has already been filed and further trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that further trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Kailash S/o Mohanlal, in connection with FIR No. 41/2026 registered at Police Station Jawar, District Jhalawar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J 64/CHETNA BEHRANI