CWP-29510-2026 [1] 109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-29510-2026 Date of decision: 11.09.2026 Ishan Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE DIVYA SHARMA Present: Mr. A.S. Talwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl. A.G. Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, DAG, Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, has submitted that inadvertently in para 7A of the petition, it has been stated that impugned order dated 19.03.2026 is not appealable, although, appeal against the impugned order lies under Section 19 of the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 and thus, he seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner file a fresh petition after giving full and better particulars. 2. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. 3. It is made clear that in case any such petition is filed, all issues including the issue of maintainability of writ petition would be considered at that stage. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (DIVYA SHARMA) JUDGE 11.09.2026 Pawan Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.09.11 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CWP-29510-2026 [1] 109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-29510-2026 Date of decision: 11.09.2026 Ishan Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE DIVYA SHARMA Present: Mr. A.S. Talwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl. A.G. Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, DAG, Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, has submitted that inadvertently in para 7A of the petition, it has been stated that impugned order dated 19.03.2026 is not appealable, although, appeal against the impugned order lies under Section 19 of the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 and thus, he seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner file a fresh petition after giving full and better particulars. 2. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. 3. It is made clear that in case any such petition is filed, all issues including the issue of maintainability of writ petition would be considered at that stage. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (DIVYA SHARMA) JUDGE 11.09.2026 Pawan Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.09.11 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document