CWP-5850-2004 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 107 CWP-5850-2004 (O&M) Date of decision:-10.09.2026 Baljit Singh ...Petitioner vs. Union of India and ors. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Nar, Sr. Panel counsel for the respondents-UOI. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. On 15.07.2026, since no one had put in appearance on behalf of the parties, Registry was directed to issue notice to the parties as well as to their counsels. On 19.08.2026, since notice issued to the petitioner has not been received back served or otherwise, the matter was adjourned to today to await the report. As per office report, petitioner is not residing at the given address. Further, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has also been informed. 2. Today the matter was called twice but there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive this petition, in case any cause of action survives. 5. Pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of. 10.09.2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Gaurav Arora JUDGE GAURAV ARORA 2026.09.10 17:12 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes I attest to the accuracy and Whether reportable Nointegrity of this document

CWP-5850-2004 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 107 CWP-5850-2004 (O&M) Date of decision:-10.09.2026 Baljit Singh ...Petitioner vs. Union of India and ors. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Nar, Sr. Panel counsel for the respondents-UOI. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. On 15.07.2026, since no one had put in appearance on behalf of the parties, Registry was directed to issue notice to the parties as well as to their counsels. On 19.08.2026, since notice issued to the petitioner has not been received back served or otherwise, the matter was adjourned to today to await the report. As per office report, petitioner is not residing at the given address. Further, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has also been informed. 2. Today the matter was called twice but there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive this petition, in case any cause of action survives. 5. Pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of. 10.09.2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Gaurav Arora JUDGE GAURAV ARORA 2026.09.10 17:12 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes I attest to the accuracy and Whether reportable Nointegrity of this document