IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 107 COCP-3896-2026 Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 Mukesh Devi ...Petitioner Versus Bhupender Singh Raghav ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate and Ms. Bhargavi, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed for initiating proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for alleged wilful disobedience of order dated 20.03.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Court in CWP-15098-2021. 2. On an advance copy having been furnished, Mr. Praveen Kumar, DAG, Haryana, puts in appearance on behalf of the respondents and submits that in deference of order dated 20.03.2024 (Annexure P-1), a speaking order dated 23.09.2024 had been passed, a copy of which is produced in Court. The same is taken on record as Mark ‘A’. A copy thereof stands furnished to learned counsel opposite. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after perusing the speaking order dated 23.09.2024, submits that since substantial compliance has been made, the grievance of the petitioner does not survive. He, thus, prays that the present petition be disposed of as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to take legal recourse against speaking order dated 23.09.2024, in accordance with law. HARISH KUMAR 2026.09.03 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment COCP-3896-2026 (2)

4. Disposed of as not pressed, with liberty aforesaid. ( VIKAS SURI ) September 03, 2026 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2026.09.03 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 107 COCP-3896-2026 Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 Mukesh Devi ...Petitioner Versus Bhupender Singh Raghav ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate and Ms. Bhargavi, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed for initiating proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for alleged wilful disobedience of order dated 20.03.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Court in CWP-15098-2021. 2. On an advance copy having been furnished, Mr. Praveen Kumar, DAG, Haryana, puts in appearance on behalf of the respondents and submits that in deference of order dated 20.03.2024 (Annexure P-1), a speaking order dated 23.09.2024 had been passed, a copy of which is produced in Court. The same is taken on record as Mark ‘A’. A copy thereof stands furnished to learned counsel opposite. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after perusing the speaking order dated 23.09.2024, submits that since substantial compliance has been made, the grievance of the petitioner does not survive. He, thus, prays that the present petition be disposed of as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to take legal recourse against speaking order dated 23.09.2024, in accordance with law. HARISH KUMAR 2026.09.03 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment COCP-3896-2026 (2)

4. Disposed of as not pressed, with liberty aforesaid. ( VIKAS SURI ) September 03, 2026 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2026.09.03 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment