IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114 CWP-28259-2026 DATE OF DECISION: 02.09.2026 MS STERLING MOTOR COMPANY … Petitioner (s) Versus INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-IL, GURUGRAM, HARYANA ORS ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: None. KIRTI SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. The aforesaid petition was filed by Mr. Arjun Kundra, Advocate. However, certain objections were raised by the Registry. 2. As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition, on which, objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/petitioner, who filed it, to re-file within a period of 40 days. However, the same was not taken back for refilling after removal of objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. 3. Even after the publication of the note requesting the Advocate/ petitioner to collect this case for re-filing after rectification of objections, the needful was not done. Consequently, the matter has been listed before this Court in urgent list today. 4. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. 5. In view of the facts of the matter, no further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the record. (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE 02.09.2026 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SWARNJIT SINGH 2026.09.02 19:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114 CWP-28259-2026 DATE OF DECISION: 02.09.2026 MS STERLING MOTOR COMPANY … Petitioner (s) Versus INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-IL, GURUGRAM, HARYANA ORS ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: None. KIRTI SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. The aforesaid petition was filed by Mr. Arjun Kundra, Advocate. However, certain objections were raised by the Registry. 2. As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition, on which, objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/petitioner, who filed it, to re-file within a period of 40 days. However, the same was not taken back for refilling after removal of objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. 3. Even after the publication of the note requesting the Advocate/ petitioner to collect this case for re-filing after rectification of objections, the needful was not done. Consequently, the matter has been listed before this Court in urgent list today. 4. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. 5. In view of the facts of the matter, no further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the record. (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE 02.09.2026 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SWARNJIT SINGH 2026.09.02 19:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document