1 CRM-M-48061-2026 (O&M) 144 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-48061-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 RAJANPREET SINGH .. Petitioner Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present: Mr. Mohit Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioner. (through Video Conferencing) ... RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI , J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has, inter alia, argued that the petitioner is ready to join trial and he had noted down a wrong date of hearing because of which his bail was cancelled whereafter his arrest warrants were issued. 2. Notice of motion. 3. Mr. Hardeep Hans, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of State of Punjab and makes a statement at Bar that keeping in view the facts/circumstances of the matter in question, he does not wish to file response to the petition. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel on the petition in question. After such hearing, I am of the considered opinion that in the circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate to direct the petitioner to appear before the Court concerned within 15 days from today and move an application for bail, which shall be JASMINE KAUR 2026.08.27 19:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 2 CRM-M-48061-2026 (O&M) disposed of in accordance with law within a further period of 7 days therefrom. Ordered accordingly.

5. The impugned order (Annexure P-1) is set aside. Petition is disposed of. 6. Interim application(s), if any, is/are also disposed of. 27.08.2026 (RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) Jasmine Kaur JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes No Whether reportable Yes No JASMINE KAUR 2026.08.27 19:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

1 CRM-M-48061-2026 (O&M) 144 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-48061-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 RAJANPREET SINGH .. Petitioner Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present: Mr. Mohit Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioner. (through Video Conferencing) ... RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI , J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has, inter alia, argued that the petitioner is ready to join trial and he had noted down a wrong date of hearing because of which his bail was cancelled whereafter his arrest warrants were issued. 2. Notice of motion. 3. Mr. Hardeep Hans, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of State of Punjab and makes a statement at Bar that keeping in view the facts/circumstances of the matter in question, he does not wish to file response to the petition. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel on the petition in question. After such hearing, I am of the considered opinion that in the circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate to direct the petitioner to appear before the Court concerned within 15 days from today and move an application for bail, which shall be JASMINE KAUR 2026.08.27 19:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 2 CRM-M-48061-2026 (O&M) disposed of in accordance with law within a further period of 7 days therefrom. Ordered accordingly.

5. The impugned order (Annexure P-1) is set aside. Petition is disposed of. 6. Interim application(s), if any, is/are also disposed of. 27.08.2026 (RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) Jasmine Kaur JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes No Whether reportable Yes No JASMINE KAUR 2026.08.27 19:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document