Punjab & Haryana High Court
Karamjeet v. State of Haryana & Ors.
CWP/27393/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-08-27
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Harpreet Singh Brar
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
1 CWP-27393-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 CWP-27393-2026 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 Karamjeet .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Ms. Monika Khatri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG Haryana-State. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ or order in mandamus the nature of directing respondents to implement order dated 04.02.2026 (Annexure P-2) passed by respondent No.2 and grant all benefits which have been granted other petitioners in CWP-33322-2025 and the arrears be paid along with interest @ 18%p.am and also to pay costs of Rs.50,000/- as per order dated 11.11.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by this Court. PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.08.27 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CWP-27393-2026
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the petitioner had earlier approached this Court by way of CWP-33322-2025, Kailash Nath and others v. State of Haryana and others, decided on 11.11.2025 (Annexure P-2). It is submitted that, in compliance with the aforesaid order, the benefit claimed therein has already been extended to all the similarly situated petitioners; however, the petitioner herein has not been granted the said benefit despite the passing of the aforesaid order. In this regard, the petitioner submitted a legal notice dated 20.07.2026 (Annexure P-3), which is stated to be pending consideration. 2.1 At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the legal notice dated 20.07.2026 (Annexure P-3), by passing a reasoned and speaking order, strictly in accordance with law, within a time-bound period. 3. On advance notice, learned State counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submits that he has no objection to issuance of a direction to respondents No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the legal notice dated 20.07.2026 (Annexure P-3), by passing a reasoned and speaking order, strictly in accordance with law, within a stipulated period. However, learned State counsel submits that the case of the petitioner is already under active consideration. PUNEET CHAWLA
2026.08.27 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3 CWP-27393-2026 4. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.2 /competent authority to consider and decide upon the legal notice dated 20.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) by passing a reasoned and speaking order strictly in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. 5. It is needless to observe that, in the event the petitioner is found entitled to the relief claimed, the same shall also be extended expeditiously, strictly in accordance with law. 6. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 27.08.2026 Puneet Chawla Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.08.27 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document