IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 CRWP-10417-2026 Date of Decision:-27.08.2026 VIJAY LAXMI AND ANOTHER ......Petitioners. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present:- Mr. Abhishek Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Amrik Singh Narwal, DAG, Haryana. *** RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that both the petitioners are of marriageable age and have married each other out of their free will and consent but against the wishes of the respondents No.4 to 6 because of which the said respondents are now threatening life and liberty of the petitioners; and that representation Annexure P-5 moved by the petitioners before the Superintendent of Police, Mini Secretariat, Panipat, Haryana has till date not been decided. 2. Notice of the petition to the respondents No.1 to 3 at this stage. 3. Mr. Amrik Singh Narwal, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on their behalf. 4. Without commenting anything upon the validity or otherwise of LALITA 2026.08.27 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

the alleged marriage of the petitioners and also upon merits of the petition in question, since the petitioners apprehend danger to their life and liberty from the respondents No.4 to 6, the present petition, at this stage, is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to look into the representation Annexure P-5 and if the need be, ensure protection of life and liberty of the petitioners. 5. All interim application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed off. (RAMESHCHANDER DIMRI) 27.08.2026 JUDGE Lalita-II Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No LALITA 2026.08.27 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 CRWP-10417-2026 Date of Decision:-27.08.2026 VIJAY LAXMI AND ANOTHER ......Petitioners. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present:- Mr. Abhishek Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Amrik Singh Narwal, DAG, Haryana. *** RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that both the petitioners are of marriageable age and have married each other out of their free will and consent but against the wishes of the respondents No.4 to 6 because of which the said respondents are now threatening life and liberty of the petitioners; and that representation Annexure P-5 moved by the petitioners before the Superintendent of Police, Mini Secretariat, Panipat, Haryana has till date not been decided. 2. Notice of the petition to the respondents No.1 to 3 at this stage. 3. Mr. Amrik Singh Narwal, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on their behalf. 4. Without commenting anything upon the validity or otherwise of LALITA 2026.08.27 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

the alleged marriage of the petitioners and also upon merits of the petition in question, since the petitioners apprehend danger to their life and liberty from the respondents No.4 to 6, the present petition, at this stage, is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to look into the representation Annexure P-5 and if the need be, ensure protection of life and liberty of the petitioners. 5. All interim application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed off. (RAMESHCHANDER DIMRI) 27.08.2026 JUDGE Lalita-II Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No LALITA 2026.08.27 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document