CRWP-10148-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGAARH (113) CRWWP-10148-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.08.2026 SIMRANJEEET KAUR AND ANOTHER ......PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLEH MS. JUSTICE NEEERJA K. KALSON Present: Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, AAG, Haaryana **** NEERJA KK. KALSON, J. (ORAL) 1. TheT present petition has been filed under Articles 226 of thhe Constitutionn of India seeking issuance of di rections to respondents No. 2 annd 3 to ensure protection of the life and libertyy of the petitioners from the handds of respondeents No. 4 to 5 and not to interffere in the matrimonial life of thhe petitioners. 2. Leaarned counsel for the petitionerss submits that both the petitionerrs are major aand have performed marriage oon 06.08.2026. Copy of marriagge certificate iis annexed as Annexure P-3. Evver since then, the petitioners arre being threaatened with dire consequencees by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 07.08 .2026 (Annexure P-4) was alsso made to rrespondent No.2- Superintendeent of Police, Yamuna Nagaar, Haryana forr protection of their lives and libberty but in vain. Learned counseel ATUL KUMAR TRIPATHI 2026.08.24 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10148-2026 -2-

submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondents No. 2 and 3 to look into their representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents. 4. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. 5. In view of above, petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondents No. 2 to provide necessary protection to the petitioners after considering threat perceptions to their life and liberty and to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law. 6. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (NEERJA K. KALSON) JUDGE 24.08.2026 Atul 1. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No 2. Whether reportable Yes/No ATUL KUMAR TRIPATHI 2026.08.24 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-10148-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGAARH (113) CRWWP-10148-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.08.2026 SIMRANJEEET KAUR AND ANOTHER ......PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLEH MS. JUSTICE NEEERJA K. KALSON Present: Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, AAG, Haaryana **** NEERJA KK. KALSON, J. (ORAL) 1. TheT present petition has been filed under Articles 226 of thhe Constitutionn of India seeking issuance of di rections to respondents No. 2 annd 3 to ensure protection of the life and libertyy of the petitioners from the handds of respondeents No. 4 to 5 and not to interffere in the matrimonial life of thhe petitioners. 2. Leaarned counsel for the petitionerss submits that both the petitionerrs are major aand have performed marriage oon 06.08.2026. Copy of marriagge certificate iis annexed as Annexure P-3. Evver since then, the petitioners arre being threaatened with dire consequencees by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 07.08 .2026 (Annexure P-4) was alsso made to rrespondent No.2- Superintendeent of Police, Yamuna Nagaar, Haryana forr protection of their lives and libberty but in vain. Learned counseel ATUL KUMAR TRIPATHI 2026.08.24 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10148-2026 -2-

submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondents No. 2 and 3 to look into their representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents. 4. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. 5. In view of above, petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondents No. 2 to provide necessary protection to the petitioners after considering threat perceptions to their life and liberty and to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law. 6. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (NEERJA K. KALSON) JUDGE 24.08.2026 Atul 1. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No 2. Whether reportable Yes/No ATUL KUMAR TRIPATHI 2026.08.24 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document