211-20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3190-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18th August, 2026. M/S. BIOVISION INDIA .…...Petitioner(s) V/s UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ......Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present Mr. Rishab Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Senior Standing Counsel, UOI, with Ms. Himanshi Gautam, Advocate, and Ms. Drishti Saraf, Advocate for the respondents-UOI. Ms. Pridhi Sandhu, Senior Standing Counsel, and Mr. Manpreet Kanda, Advocate, for the respondent-revenue. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) 1. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing an appeal under Section 112 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, the ‘Act of 2017’), which has admittedly not been availed, we are not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the petitioner(s) intends to avail the statutory remedy by filing an appeal under Section 112 of the Act of 2017. 3. In the facts of the case, we direct that in the event the petitioner(s) files the appeal within a period of four weeks from today, SURESH KUMAR 2026.08.21 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-3190-2025 (O&M) Page 2 of 2 the same shall be entertained without any objection being raised on the ground of limitation.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. 5. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. [ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE [ROHIT KAPOOR] JUDGE August 18, 2026 Ess Kay Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SURESH KUMAR 2026.08.21 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

211-20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3190-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18th August, 2026. M/S. BIOVISION INDIA .…...Petitioner(s) V/s UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ......Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present Mr. Rishab Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Senior Standing Counsel, UOI, with Ms. Himanshi Gautam, Advocate, and Ms. Drishti Saraf, Advocate for the respondents-UOI. Ms. Pridhi Sandhu, Senior Standing Counsel, and Mr. Manpreet Kanda, Advocate, for the respondent-revenue. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) 1. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing an appeal under Section 112 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, the ‘Act of 2017’), which has admittedly not been availed, we are not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the petitioner(s) intends to avail the statutory remedy by filing an appeal under Section 112 of the Act of 2017. 3. In the facts of the case, we direct that in the event the petitioner(s) files the appeal within a period of four weeks from today, SURESH KUMAR 2026.08.21 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-3190-2025 (O&M) Page 2 of 2 the same shall be entertained without any objection being raised on the ground of limitation.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. 5. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. [ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE [ROHIT KAPOOR] JUDGE August 18, 2026 Ess Kay Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SURESH KUMAR 2026.08.21 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document