IN THHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGAARH 245. CWP-3612-2024 Date of decision: 28.07.2026 Baljit ... Petitioner Versus Haryana Powwer Generation Corporation andd others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMMAN CHAUDHARY Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Senior Adv ocate with Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Addl. AGG, Haryana. **** AMAN CHHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. The prayer made in the presentt petition is for issuance of a writt in the naturee of mandamus directing the resppondents to consider the case off petitioner’s son for employment, as per ppolicy dated 05.07.2007 of thee Power Depaartment, Government of Haryanaa. 2. Learned counsel for the respoondents has no objection to thee limited prayyer made. 3. In view of the above and withoout commenting upon the meritss of the casee, this petition is hereby dispo sed of with a direction to thee respondentss to consider and decide tthe claim of the petitioner,, expeditiouslly, in accordance with law, after granting of opportunity of SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.29 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-3612-2024 - 2 - hearing to him, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner.

4. Upon doing so, if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 28.07.2026 JUDGE sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.29 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

IN THHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGAARH 245. CWP-3612-2024 Date of decision: 28.07.2026 Baljit ... Petitioner Versus Haryana Powwer Generation Corporation andd others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMMAN CHAUDHARY Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Senior Adv ocate with Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Addl. AGG, Haryana. **** AMAN CHHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. The prayer made in the presentt petition is for issuance of a writt in the naturee of mandamus directing the resppondents to consider the case off petitioner’s son for employment, as per ppolicy dated 05.07.2007 of thee Power Depaartment, Government of Haryanaa. 2. Learned counsel for the respoondents has no objection to thee limited prayyer made. 3. In view of the above and withoout commenting upon the meritss of the casee, this petition is hereby dispo sed of with a direction to thee respondentss to consider and decide tthe claim of the petitioner,, expeditiouslly, in accordance with law, after granting of opportunity of SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.29 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-3612-2024 - 2 - hearing to him, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner.

4. Upon doing so, if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 28.07.2026 JUDGE sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.29 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document