IN THE HHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 129 CWPP-23212-2026 Datee of Decision: 28.07.2026 Virender DDev Arya .… Petitioner Versus State of Haaryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advvocate with Mr. Sankalp Gehlawat, Advoccate for the petitioner. NIDHI GUUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this writ petition fileed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitutioon of India is for quashing thhe Inquiry Report/Order dated 03.08.20211 (Annexure P-19) passedd by the District Level Committeee/Local Committee Panipat (Resspondent No. 5) and further for quashing thhe Memorandum of Charge-she et dated 24.01.2023 (Annexure P-22) issueed by respondent No. 2. After arguing for some time, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permmitted to withdraw the instant petition, wwith liberty to the petitioner to taake recourse to the appropriate remedy, if any, in accordance with law.. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any,, shall stands disposed of. 28.07.20266 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.29 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

IN THE HHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 129 CWPP-23212-2026 Datee of Decision: 28.07.2026 Virender DDev Arya .… Petitioner Versus State of Haaryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advvocate with Mr. Sankalp Gehlawat, Advoccate for the petitioner. NIDHI GUUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this writ petition fileed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitutioon of India is for quashing thhe Inquiry Report/Order dated 03.08.20211 (Annexure P-19) passedd by the District Level Committeee/Local Committee Panipat (Resspondent No. 5) and further for quashing thhe Memorandum of Charge-she et dated 24.01.2023 (Annexure P-22) issueed by respondent No. 2. After arguing for some time, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permmitted to withdraw the instant petition, wwith liberty to the petitioner to taake recourse to the appropriate remedy, if any, in accordance with law.. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any,, shall stands disposed of. 28.07.20266 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.29 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.