Punjab & Haryana High Court
Sh Divakar Kumar & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
CWP/23032/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-07-27
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Nidhi Gupta
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
CWP-23032-2026 (O & M) 1 IN TTHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGAARH 117 CWP No.23032 of 2026 (O & M) Date of decision :-27.07.2026 Divakar KKumar and others …..Petitioners Versus State of HHaryana and others …..Respondents CORAM::- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NID HI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Sunil K. Nehra, Sr. Advocaate with Mr. Arun Dosanj, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DAG,, Haryana. NIDHI GUUPTA J. (Oral) 1. Present writ petition under Artticle 226 of the Constitution of India has bbeen filed by the petitioners for isssuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamuss directing the respondents to rregularize the services of the petitionerss on the post on which they are wworking from the date of their appointmeent with all consequential benefits iin view of the judgment passed by the Hoon’ble Supreme Court in ‘Jaggo vvs. Union of India and others, SCC OnLiine SC 3826’. 2. At the very outset, learnedd Senior Counsel for the petitionerss has placed reliance upon a judgmment dated 12.05.2026 passed by a co-orrdinate Bench of this Court in a buunch of writ petitions having leading caase CWP-1770-2026, titled as ‘DDeepak Singh and others vs. State of HHaryana and others’ including petittion bearing No. CWP-7007-2026 titledd as ‘Dr. Ravi Godara and otherrs vs. State of Haryana and others’ to submit that the grievance of all the 50 petitioners herein is VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.30 12.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-23032-2026 (O & M) 2 identical too that of the petitioners (in CWP- 7007-2026) as they belonged to the samme Department, rendering more thaan 10 years of service. In this regard, leaarned Senior Counsel for the petittioners refers to the length of service off all the petitioners herein as enummerated in tabulated form in para No. 22 of the writ petition (at page No. 119 and 20 of the paper-book), as per whiich all the petitioners have rendereed 10 years plus service. It is, therefore, prayed that the present petition maay be disposed of in terms of the judgmment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jaggo’s case (supra) as well as judgmeent of this Court dated 12.05.20266 passed in Deepak Singh’s case (suprra). 3. Learned counsel for the respoondent-State submits that he ‘no objectiion’ to the same. 4. Heard. 5. Accordingly, with the consennt of learned counsel for the parties, preesent Civil Writ Petition stands dissposed of, with a direction to the State oof Haryana/concerned Department to accord fresh consideration to the claaim of each of the petitioners foor regularization; and pass a speaking oorder thereupon within a period of 08 months from today, while keeping inn mind the judgment of Hon’ble Suupreme Court in Jaggo’s case (supra) ass well as judgment of this Court dated 12.05.2026 in Deepak Singh’s caase (supra). 6. Pending application(s) if any allso stand(s) disposed of. July 27, 20026 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asij a JUDGE Whether speeaking/reasoned Yes / No
Whether Repportable Yes / No VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.30 12.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document