IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 CWP-6064-2026 Date of Decision: 27.07.2026 Malkiat Kaur and others ..... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. A.D.S. Jattana, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.S. Pandher, Addl. A.G., Punjab. ***** DEEPAK SIBAL, J (ORAL) 1. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the order dated 06.01.2026 through which an Administrator has been appointed to carry out works under the MGNREGA Scheme with regard to Village Sialka, District Amritsar stands withdrawn and that since the Sarpanch of Village Sialka was already suspended for the acts of omission or remission on her part, against which suspension, her appeal is pending before the Appellate Authority, an authorized Panch has been elected in place of the appointed Administrator. 2. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 27.07.2026 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2026.07.29 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 CWP-6064-2026 Date of Decision: 27.07.2026 Malkiat Kaur and others ..... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. A.D.S. Jattana, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.S. Pandher, Addl. A.G., Punjab. ***** DEEPAK SIBAL, J (ORAL) 1. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the order dated 06.01.2026 through which an Administrator has been appointed to carry out works under the MGNREGA Scheme with regard to Village Sialka, District Amritsar stands withdrawn and that since the Sarpanch of Village Sialka was already suspended for the acts of omission or remission on her part, against which suspension, her appeal is pending before the Appellate Authority, an authorized Panch has been elected in place of the appointed Administrator. 2. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 27.07.2026 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2026.07.29 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh