131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22901-2026 Date of decision: 27.07.2026 PARVEEN KUMAR ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR ***** Present: Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. ***** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) 1. Considering the fact that the writ petition is against a notice (Annexure P-7) issued by respondent No.3/Forest Department, whereby the petitioner is directed to remove illegal encroachment, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to approach the authorities concerned. 2. As prayed for, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid. 3. In case the petitioner is aggrieved by the determination made by the authorities concerned, he shall be at liberty to pursue remedy as would be available to him, in accordance with law. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ROHIT KAPOOR) 27.07.2026 JUDGE mohit goyal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT GOYAL 2026.07.29 11:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22901-2026 Date of decision: 27.07.2026 PARVEEN KUMAR ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR ***** Present: Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. ***** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) 1. Considering the fact that the writ petition is against a notice (Annexure P-7) issued by respondent No.3/Forest Department, whereby the petitioner is directed to remove illegal encroachment, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to approach the authorities concerned. 2. As prayed for, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid. 3. In case the petitioner is aggrieved by the determination made by the authorities concerned, he shall be at liberty to pursue remedy as would be available to him, in accordance with law. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ROHIT KAPOOR) 27.07.2026 JUDGE mohit goyal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT GOYAL 2026.07.29 11:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document