110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-30780-2025 Date of decision: 23.07.2026 KRISHNA ...PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate and Mr. Sukhdev Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.4-HSIIDC. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for setting aside/quashing notification under Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’) dated 10.01.2011 (Annexure P-2) and notification under Section 6 of the Act dated 17.08.2020 (Annexure P-5) qua the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has submitted that in the present case, the award has not been challenged although, the petition has been filed after passing of the award and has further submitted that petitioner had never filed any objections to the same. MANISHA 2026.07.24 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-30780-2025 -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner in view of the above has submitted that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after making appropriate prayers.

4. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) July 23, 2026 JUDGE Manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2026.07.24 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-30780-2025 Date of decision: 23.07.2026 KRISHNA ...PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate and Mr. Sukhdev Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.4-HSIIDC. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for setting aside/quashing notification under Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’) dated 10.01.2011 (Annexure P-2) and notification under Section 6 of the Act dated 17.08.2020 (Annexure P-5) qua the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has submitted that in the present case, the award has not been challenged although, the petition has been filed after passing of the award and has further submitted that petitioner had never filed any objections to the same. MANISHA 2026.07.24 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-30780-2025 -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner in view of the above has submitted that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after making appropriate prayers.

4. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) July 23, 2026 JUDGE Manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2026.07.24 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document