IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 127 COCP-3224-2026 Date of decision:22.07.2026 SANJAY KUMAR ..PETITIONER VERSUS CHAKKIRALA SAMBASIVA RAO, IPS ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: None for petitioner. Mr. Ram Karan, DAG, Haryana. *** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) This Court vide order dated 13.03.2026 passed in CWP No.25919 of 2022 had directed petitioner that upon representation by petitioner, respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law/rules within a period of two months from the date of submission of such representation. 2. Learned counsel for State submits that in compliance to order dated 13.03.2026, representation of petitioner has been decided by respondent-Department vide speaking order dated 17.07.2026. 3. In view of above submissions and orders dated 17.07.2026, nothing survives in present contempt petition. However, petitioner shall be at liberty to seek legal remedies in accordance with law if he is still aggrieved by order dated 17.07.2026 passed by respondent-Department. SUNIL CHANDER 2026.07.24 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-3224-2026 -2- 4. Present contempt petition is disposed of accordingly. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (PARMOD GOYAL) JUDGE 22.07.2026 Sunil Chander Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUNIL CHANDER 2026.07.24 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 127 COCP-3224-2026 Date of decision:22.07.2026 SANJAY KUMAR ..PETITIONER VERSUS CHAKKIRALA SAMBASIVA RAO, IPS ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: None for petitioner. Mr. Ram Karan, DAG, Haryana. *** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) This Court vide order dated 13.03.2026 passed in CWP No.25919 of 2022 had directed petitioner that upon representation by petitioner, respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law/rules within a period of two months from the date of submission of such representation. 2. Learned counsel for State submits that in compliance to order dated 13.03.2026, representation of petitioner has been decided by respondent-Department vide speaking order dated 17.07.2026. 3. In view of above submissions and orders dated 17.07.2026, nothing survives in present contempt petition. However, petitioner shall be at liberty to seek legal remedies in accordance with law if he is still aggrieved by order dated 17.07.2026 passed by respondent-Department. SUNIL CHANDER 2026.07.24 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-3224-2026 -2- 4. Present contempt petition is disposed of accordingly. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (PARMOD GOYAL) JUDGE 22.07.2026 Sunil Chander Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUNIL CHANDER 2026.07.24 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document