Punjab & Haryana High Court
Neelam Rani & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
CRWP/8686/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-07-22
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Surya Partap Singh
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
AT CHANDIGARH 114 CRWP-8686-2026 Date of decision : 22.07.2026 NEELAM RANI AND ANR ...... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG, Haryana. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH . J.(Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners for directions to the respondent No.2 & 3 to protect their life and liberty from the respondent No.4. 2. The learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed representation 10.07.2026 (Annexure P-6) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the above-mentioned representation within the stipulated time. 3. Notice of motion VIPIN KUMAR 2026.07.22 19:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8686-2026 2 4. Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3-State. Hence, the service of notice upon the State is hereby dispensed with. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for deciding the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-6) be given to the respondent No.2, and that the instant petition be disposed of accordingly.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.-2 to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexures P-6), by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioners, and take an independent decision at his own level. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 22.07.2026 vipin Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No VIPIN KUMAR 2026.07.22 19:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document