1 CWP-22193-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 128 CWP-22193-2026 Date of Decision: 21.07.2026 DR. JYOTI AND OTHERS .....Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR : Present Mr. Dalbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG Haryana. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) 1. This Civil Writ Petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned recovery memos dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-34) and 15.07.2026 (Annexure P-36) issued to the petitioners, mandamus and for the issuance of a writ in the nature of directing the respondents not to recover the alleged excess remuneration from the petitioners and to continue paying them the enhanced remuneration in accordance with law, along with an interim direction to stay the operation of the impugned recovery memos dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-34) and PARUL VERMA 2026.07.21 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. 2 CWP-22193-2026 15.07.2026 (Annexure P-36) during the pendency of the present writ petition. 2. Learned State counsel, at the outset, submits that the impugned memos dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-34) and 15.07.2026 (Annexure P-36) have been withdrawn vide Annexure R-1 and that nothing survives in the present writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has produced written instructions dated 21.07.2026 along with Annexure R-1 before this Court today. The same are taken on record as Mark 'X' and Annexure R-1, respectively. The Registry is directed to tag the same at the appropriate place. A copy thereof has been supplied to learned State counsel. 4. Upon perusal of Annexure R-1, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, in view of the withdrawal of the impugned recovery memos by the respondents, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such. 5. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 21.07.2026 parul verma Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No PARUL VERMA 2026.07.21 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

1 CWP-22193-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 128 CWP-22193-2026 Date of Decision: 21.07.2026 DR. JYOTI AND OTHERS .....Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR : Present Mr. Dalbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG Haryana. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) 1. This Civil Writ Petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned recovery memos dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-34) and 15.07.2026 (Annexure P-36) issued to the petitioners, mandamus and for the issuance of a writ in the nature of directing the respondents not to recover the alleged excess remuneration from the petitioners and to continue paying them the enhanced remuneration in accordance with law, along with an interim direction to stay the operation of the impugned recovery memos dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-34) and PARUL VERMA 2026.07.21 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. 2 CWP-22193-2026 15.07.2026 (Annexure P-36) during the pendency of the present writ petition. 2. Learned State counsel, at the outset, submits that the impugned memos dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-34) and 15.07.2026 (Annexure P-36) have been withdrawn vide Annexure R-1 and that nothing survives in the present writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has produced written instructions dated 21.07.2026 along with Annexure R-1 before this Court today. The same are taken on record as Mark 'X' and Annexure R-1, respectively. The Registry is directed to tag the same at the appropriate place. A copy thereof has been supplied to learned State counsel. 4. Upon perusal of Annexure R-1, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, in view of the withdrawal of the impugned recovery memos by the respondents, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such. 5. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 21.07.2026 parul verma Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No PARUL VERMA 2026.07.21 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.