Punjab & Haryana High Court
Paramjit Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.
CRM-M/35899/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-07-21
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Virinder Aggarwal
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
1 CRM-M-35899-2026 (O&M) IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 122 CRM-M-35899-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.07.2026 PARAMJIT SINGH ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. K.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973), seeking transfer of investigation of DDR No.11 dated 01.04.2026 in FIR No.63 dated 01.04.2026 at P.S. Dehlon District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana to some other district for fair and impartial investigation and further seeking directions to respondents No.2 to 4 to take action against respondents No.5 and 6. 2. After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner submitted a representation dated 21.05.2026 (Annexures P-5) to respondent No.2- Director General of Police, Punjab, Chandigarh and he would be satisfied if appropriate direction be issued to respondent No.4-Senior Superintendent of Police, Ludhiana to consider and decide representation dated 21.05.2026 (Annexure P-5) moved by petitioner and take necessary action thereupon in a time bound manner in accordance with law. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.22 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2
CRM-M-35899-2026 (O&M) 3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. 4. Mr. J.S. Rattu, learned DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that respondent No.4-Senior Superintendent of Police, Ludhiaana will look into the matter and needful would be done in due course. 5. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4-Senior Superintendent of Police, Ludhiana to decide the representation dated 21.05.2026 (Annexure P-5) submitted by petitioner within a period of four weeks’ from today by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if so required. 6. However, if, respondent No.4 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law. 7. Petition stands disposed of. 8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 21.07.2026 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.22 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document