147 IN THE HIGH COURT OFF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHAANDIGARH CWP-219970-2026 (O&M) Date of DDecision : 20.07.2026 U.T., ADMINISTRATION THHROUGH SECRETARYANND ANOTHEER ........Petitionerrs VERSUUS CENTRAAL ADMINISTRATION TRIBBUNAL, CHANDIGARH ANDD OTHERSS ........Respondeents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HAARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocatee and Mr. Abhishek Premi, Advocaate for the petitioners. HARSIMMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Orall) 1. In the present petition, the cchallenge is to the impugned orrder dated 17..12.2025, copy of which has bbeen appended as Annexure P-1,P passed byy the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred aas “Tribunal”) in Original Appllication No.060/000395/2024 tittled “Hari Moohan Vs. U.T., Administration aand ors”. 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitionners submits thhat the present petition may kinndly be disposed of as having been not presseed any further. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. Pending application(s), if anyy, shall stand disposed of. (HAARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 20-07-20226 (AMAARINDER SINGH GREWAL)) Sapna Goyal JUDGE NOOTE: Whether speaking/ reeasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.21 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

147 IN THE HIGH COURT OFF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHAANDIGARH CWP-219970-2026 (O&M) Date of DDecision : 20.07.2026 U.T., ADMINISTRATION THHROUGH SECRETARYANND ANOTHEER ........Petitionerrs VERSUUS CENTRAAL ADMINISTRATION TRIBBUNAL, CHANDIGARH ANDD OTHERSS ........Respondeents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HAARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocatee and Mr. Abhishek Premi, Advocaate for the petitioners. HARSIMMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Orall) 1. In the present petition, the cchallenge is to the impugned orrder dated 17..12.2025, copy of which has bbeen appended as Annexure P-1,P passed byy the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred aas “Tribunal”) in Original Appllication No.060/000395/2024 tittled “Hari Moohan Vs. U.T., Administration aand ors”. 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitionners submits thhat the present petition may kinndly be disposed of as having been not presseed any further. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. Pending application(s), if anyy, shall stand disposed of. (HAARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 20-07-20226 (AMAARINDER SINGH GREWAL)) Sapna Goyal JUDGE NOOTE: Whether speaking/ reeasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.21 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document