CM-4693-LPA-2026; CM-4694-LPA-2026; CM-4695-LPA-2026 in/and LPA-1936-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (122) CM-4693-LPA-2026; CM-4694-LPA-2026; CM-4695-LPA-2026 in/and LPA-1936-2026 Date of Decision : 20.07.2026 State of Punjab and Another ...Appellants Versus Gurvinder Singh and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Rahul Rampal, Addl. A.G. Punjab, assisted by Mr. Kulwinder Singh, Superintendent, Department of Local Bodies, Punjab, for the appellants. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) CM-4693-LPA-2026 Present application has been filed for seeking condonation of delay of 127 days in filing the appeal. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed and delay of 127 days in filing the appeal is condoned. LPA-1936-2026(O&M) 1. Learned State counsel for the appellants, on instructions, submits that though, the appellants have no objection in implementing the judgment dated 15.03.2024 passed by learned Single Judge qua the respondents herein, who were diligent enough to approach the Court to seek SHUBHAM 2026.07.27 13:56 I am the author of this document 1 | P a g e CM-4693-LPA-2026; CM-4694-LPA-2026; CM-4695-LPA-2026 in/and LPA-1936-2026

redressal of their grievance by submitting a demand notice but, as the selection for Driver/Operator/Fireman has already been finalized, the same will open flood gates. The only apprehension is that all other similarly situated persons will also ask for the same review, which will further delay the selection process. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellants and have gone through the record with his able assistance. 3. It may be noticed that the apprehension of the learned counsel for the appellant is incorrect as, in case anybody who has not approached the Court in case of any such claim being raised at the belated stage, the Court will appreciate the said fact while deciding the issue. 4. Learned counsel submits that keeping in view the said observations, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 5. Ordered accordingly. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE July 20, 2026 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No SHUBHAM 2026.07.27 13:56 I am the author of this document 2 | P a g e

CM-4693-LPA-2026; CM-4694-LPA-2026; CM-4695-LPA-2026 in/and LPA-1936-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (122) CM-4693-LPA-2026; CM-4694-LPA-2026; CM-4695-LPA-2026 in/and LPA-1936-2026 Date of Decision : 20.07.2026 State of Punjab and Another ...Appellants Versus Gurvinder Singh and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Rahul Rampal, Addl. A.G. Punjab, assisted by Mr. Kulwinder Singh, Superintendent, Department of Local Bodies, Punjab, for the appellants. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) CM-4693-LPA-2026 Present application has been filed for seeking condonation of delay of 127 days in filing the appeal. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed and delay of 127 days in filing the appeal is condoned. LPA-1936-2026(O&M) 1. Learned State counsel for the appellants, on instructions, submits that though, the appellants have no objection in implementing the judgment dated 15.03.2024 passed by learned Single Judge qua the respondents herein, who were diligent enough to approach the Court to seek SHUBHAM 2026.07.27 13:56 I am the author of this document 1 | P a g e CM-4693-LPA-2026; CM-4694-LPA-2026; CM-4695-LPA-2026 in/and LPA-1936-2026

redressal of their grievance by submitting a demand notice but, as the selection for Driver/Operator/Fireman has already been finalized, the same will open flood gates. The only apprehension is that all other similarly situated persons will also ask for the same review, which will further delay the selection process. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellants and have gone through the record with his able assistance. 3. It may be noticed that the apprehension of the learned counsel for the appellant is incorrect as, in case anybody who has not approached the Court in case of any such claim being raised at the belated stage, the Court will appreciate the said fact while deciding the issue. 4. Learned counsel submits that keeping in view the said observations, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 5. Ordered accordingly. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE July 20, 2026 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No SHUBHAM 2026.07.27 13:56 I am the author of this document 2 | P a g e