IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 117 CWP-21724-2026 Date of decision : 20.07.2026 Sukhwinder Kaur ….Petitioner V/S Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and others ….Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. H.P.S. Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Buta Singh Bairagi, Advocate for the respondents. **** NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents for providing her family pension and released her amounts of G.P.F., Gratuity, Leave Encashment etc. with interest @ 12% per annum on the ground that the deceased husband of the petitioner, namely Kulbir Kumar, was employee of the respondent-department whose services were terminated, vide order dated 08.06.2007. 2. After arguing the case for sometime and realising that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter as family of the dismissed employee is not entitled for family pension, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to avail other legal remedies in accordance with law. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. 20.07.2026 (NAMIT KUMAR) kothiyal JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No VINOD KOTHIYAL Whether Reportable: Yes/No 2026.07.20 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 117 CWP-21724-2026 Date of decision : 20.07.2026 Sukhwinder Kaur ….Petitioner V/S Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and others ….Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. H.P.S. Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Buta Singh Bairagi, Advocate for the respondents. **** NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents for providing her family pension and released her amounts of G.P.F., Gratuity, Leave Encashment etc. with interest @ 12% per annum on the ground that the deceased husband of the petitioner, namely Kulbir Kumar, was employee of the respondent-department whose services were terminated, vide order dated 08.06.2007. 2. After arguing the case for sometime and realising that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter as family of the dismissed employee is not entitled for family pension, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to avail other legal remedies in accordance with law. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. 20.07.2026 (NAMIT KUMAR) kothiyal JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No VINOD KOTHIYAL Whether Reportable: Yes/No 2026.07.20 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document