IN THE HHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 105 CWPP-1375-2025 Datee of Decision: 17.07.2026 Bhateri Devvi .… Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: HHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. A..G., Haryana. Proxy counsel for Mr. HS Oberoi, for respondent No. 2. NIDHI GUUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer in the present writ petitiion filed under Article 226 of the Constitutionn of India is for issuance of a wwrit in the nature of Mandamus directing thhe respondents to grant Dual Fammily Pension after considering the case of thee petitioner as, she is entitled annd eligible for the same as per Gazette Nootification issued by the Financee Department Govt. of Madhya Pradesh datted 23.12.2014 and to release alll the consequential benefits with the arrears ffrom the date from which the petiitioner is entitled for dual Family Pension aloong with interest @ 18% per annuum. 2. After arguing for some time, leearned counsel for the petitioner submits thaat he may be permitted to withhdraw the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulaars. 3. Permitted to do so. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with thhe liberty aforesaid. 5. Pending application(s), if any, sshall also stand disposed of. 17.07.2026 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.17 17:22

I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

IN THE HHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 105 CWPP-1375-2025 Datee of Decision: 17.07.2026 Bhateri Devvi .… Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: HHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. A..G., Haryana. Proxy counsel for Mr. HS Oberoi, for respondent No. 2. NIDHI GUUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer in the present writ petitiion filed under Article 226 of the Constitutionn of India is for issuance of a wwrit in the nature of Mandamus directing thhe respondents to grant Dual Fammily Pension after considering the case of thee petitioner as, she is entitled annd eligible for the same as per Gazette Nootification issued by the Financee Department Govt. of Madhya Pradesh datted 23.12.2014 and to release alll the consequential benefits with the arrears ffrom the date from which the petiitioner is entitled for dual Family Pension aloong with interest @ 18% per annuum. 2. After arguing for some time, leearned counsel for the petitioner submits thaat he may be permitted to withhdraw the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulaars. 3. Permitted to do so. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with thhe liberty aforesaid. 5. Pending application(s), if any, sshall also stand disposed of. 17.07.2026 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.17 17:22

I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.