REEMA SAINI 2026.07.17 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh 2 CRM-M-14907 of 2026 (O&M) also suffered a cut on his hand. The cause of dispute was a motor connection. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was initially allowed regular bail vide order dated 24.09.2025 of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Baghapurana. The order of regular bail was, however, cancelled by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Baghapurana on 21.11.2025 pursuant to which petitioner surrendered in the Court and was in custody since then. Investigation of the case was complete. Challan had been presented. Co-accused Manjit Kaur had been allowed anticipatory bail vide order dated 12.09.2025. Petitioner had no criminal antecedents and the dispute occurred as complainant, who was unhappy with marriage of the petitioner with the Scheduled Cast lady, abused the petitioner and his wife. 4. Learned State counsel assisted by Mr. Surinder Garg, learned counsel for complainant opposes the prayer for regular bail arguing that gandasi blow inflicted by the petitioner had severed thumb of the complainant, his real brother. An application for invoking Section 109 BNS was also pending, before learned Trial Court and considering the gravity of allegations, petitioner did not deserve the concession of regular bail.

5. The dispute is between real brothers. Investigation of the case is complete. Petitioner who is in custody w.e.f 28.01.2026 has roots in the society and there is no apprehension expressed that he would evade the trial, tamper with evidence or influence the witnesses. Trial is not likely to conclude soon as case is at nascent stage. Allegations against the petitioner are to be tested during the course of trial. Object of bail is not punitive and REEMA SAINIfurther incarceration of the petitioner is not warranted. Considering the 2026.07.17 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh 3 CRM-M-14907 of 2026 (O&M) period of incarceration, clean antecedents of the petitioner besides all relevant facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting on merits, petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail subject to his furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE 17.07.2026 reema Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No REEMA SAINI 2026.07.17 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

REEMA SAINI 2026.07.17 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh 2 CRM-M-14907 of 2026 (O&M) also suffered a cut on his hand. The cause of dispute was a motor connection. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was initially allowed regular bail vide order dated 24.09.2025 of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Baghapurana. The order of regular bail was, however, cancelled by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Baghapurana on 21.11.2025 pursuant to which petitioner surrendered in the Court and was in custody since then. Investigation of the case was complete. Challan had been presented. Co-accused Manjit Kaur had been allowed anticipatory bail vide order dated 12.09.2025. Petitioner had no criminal antecedents and the dispute occurred as complainant, who was unhappy with marriage of the petitioner with the Scheduled Cast lady, abused the petitioner and his wife. 4. Learned State counsel assisted by Mr. Surinder Garg, learned counsel for complainant opposes the prayer for regular bail arguing that gandasi blow inflicted by the petitioner had severed thumb of the complainant, his real brother. An application for invoking Section 109 BNS was also pending, before learned Trial Court and considering the gravity of allegations, petitioner did not deserve the concession of regular bail.

5. The dispute is between real brothers. Investigation of the case is complete. Petitioner who is in custody w.e.f 28.01.2026 has roots in the society and there is no apprehension expressed that he would evade the trial, tamper with evidence or influence the witnesses. Trial is not likely to conclude soon as case is at nascent stage. Allegations against the petitioner are to be tested during the course of trial. Object of bail is not punitive and REEMA SAINIfurther incarceration of the petitioner is not warranted. Considering the 2026.07.17 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh 3 CRM-M-14907 of 2026 (O&M) period of incarceration, clean antecedents of the petitioner besides all relevant facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting on merits, petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail subject to his furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE 17.07.2026 reema Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No REEMA SAINI 2026.07.17 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh