CRWP-8393-2026 1 121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8393-2026 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 SONIA ......... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Bhavesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to official respondent No.2 to ensure protection of the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 and 5 and further directions to respondent No.2 to decided representation dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate direction is issued to the respondent No. 2- Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, Punjab to consider and decide representation dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) moved by petitioner and take necessary action thereupon in a time bound manner in accordance with law. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.16 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that needful would be done in due course.

5. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2-Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, Punjab to decide the aforesaid representation dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) submitted by petitioner within a period of four weeks’ from today by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if so required. 6. However, if, respondent No.2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law. 7. Petition stands disposed of. 8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 16.07.2026 S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.16 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-8393-2026 1 121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8393-2026 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 SONIA ......... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Bhavesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to official respondent No.2 to ensure protection of the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 and 5 and further directions to respondent No.2 to decided representation dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate direction is issued to the respondent No. 2- Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, Punjab to consider and decide representation dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) moved by petitioner and take necessary action thereupon in a time bound manner in accordance with law. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.16 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that needful would be done in due course.

5. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2-Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, Punjab to decide the aforesaid representation dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) submitted by petitioner within a period of four weeks’ from today by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if so required. 6. However, if, respondent No.2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law. 7. Petition stands disposed of. 8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 16.07.2026 S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.16 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document