Vijay Kumar v. State of Haryana

CRM-M/29433/2026

Decision date: 2026-07-16
Text availability: Full text
Judges: Jasjit Singh Bedi

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 210 CRM-M-29433-2026 Date of decision: 16.07.2026 VIJAY KUMAR .... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.P. Singh, Senior DAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.83 dated 01.05.2026 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 21(b) of NDPS Act, 1985 registered at Police Station City Narwana, District Jind, Haryana. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 21.05.2026 passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation. The learned State Counsel on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined investigation in terms of order dated 21.05.2026 and is not required for custodial interrogation. In this view of the matter, interim order dated 21.05.2026 is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall keep on joining the KUSUM 2026.07.16 16:42I attest to the accuracyinvestigationand as and when required to do so and he shall abide by the integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh CRM-M-29433-2026 -2- conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS. Petition stands disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 16.07.2026 Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2026.07.16 16:42

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh