REEMA SAINI 2026.07.15 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CRWP-8265 of 2026 (O&M) -2- Writ Petition Nos. 11692 of 2025 and 5168 of 2026. Following orders of this Court two gunmen were provided by Senior Superintendent of Police (Rural office). The deployment was erratic and ineffective as the PSOs were frequently withdrawn on the pretext of law and order duties by Senior Superintendent of Police. Representation, Annexure P-5 was moved by petitioner’s husband requesting for deployment of Security officers from Punjab Armed Police (PAP) but no action was taken. 3. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Rajeshwar, Security winge o/o ADGP (Secirity) Chandigarh, submits that petitioner’s representation was considered by respondent No.3 and request of the petitioner would be considered favourably subject to availability of adequate security personnel in Punjab Armed Police. 4. In view of the stance of official respondents, no further directions are required to be passed. Petition stands disposed of. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE 15.07.2026 reema Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No REEMA SAINI 2026.07.15 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

REEMA SAINI 2026.07.15 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CRWP-8265 of 2026 (O&M) -2- Writ Petition Nos. 11692 of 2025 and 5168 of 2026. Following orders of this Court two gunmen were provided by Senior Superintendent of Police (Rural office). The deployment was erratic and ineffective as the PSOs were frequently withdrawn on the pretext of law and order duties by Senior Superintendent of Police. Representation, Annexure P-5 was moved by petitioner’s husband requesting for deployment of Security officers from Punjab Armed Police (PAP) but no action was taken. 3. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Rajeshwar, Security winge o/o ADGP (Secirity) Chandigarh, submits that petitioner’s representation was considered by respondent No.3 and request of the petitioner would be considered favourably subject to availability of adequate security personnel in Punjab Armed Police. 4. In view of the stance of official respondents, no further directions are required to be passed. Petition stands disposed of. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE 15.07.2026 reema Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No REEMA SAINI 2026.07.15 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh