CRM-M-28325-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 320 CRM-M-28325-2026 Date of decision:15.07.2026 Rocky & others ... Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana & others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA. Present: Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. ... MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL). 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-‘BNSS’) for quashing of FIR No.41 dated 28.01.2020, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323 and 506 of IPC (offence under Sections 307 and 325 of IPC were added lateron), at Police Station Bhuna, District Fatehabad and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 30.09.2025 (Annexure P-3). 2 . This Court vide order dated 19.05.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. HARJEET KAUR 2026.07.16 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-28325-2026 -2-

3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Judge has submitted report dated 07.07.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.41 dated 28.01.2020, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323 and 506 of IPC (offence under Sections 307 and 325 of IPC were added lateron), at Police Station Bhuna, District Fatehabad and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 30.09.2025 (Annexure P-3) are quashed qua the petitioners. (MANISHA BATRA) 15.07.2026 JUDGE harjeet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HARJEET KAUR 2026.07.16 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-28325-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 320 CRM-M-28325-2026 Date of decision:15.07.2026 Rocky & others ... Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana & others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA. Present: Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. ... MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL). 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-‘BNSS’) for quashing of FIR No.41 dated 28.01.2020, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323 and 506 of IPC (offence under Sections 307 and 325 of IPC were added lateron), at Police Station Bhuna, District Fatehabad and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 30.09.2025 (Annexure P-3). 2 . This Court vide order dated 19.05.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. HARJEET KAUR 2026.07.16 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-28325-2026 -2-

3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Judge has submitted report dated 07.07.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.41 dated 28.01.2020, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323 and 506 of IPC (offence under Sections 307 and 325 of IPC were added lateron), at Police Station Bhuna, District Fatehabad and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 30.09.2025 (Annexure P-3) are quashed qua the petitioners. (MANISHA BATRA) 15.07.2026 JUDGE harjeet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HARJEET KAUR 2026.07.16 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document