CWPNo.17402of2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 123 CWP No.17402 of 2026 Date of decision: July 14th, 2026 Mahipal Tokas .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Vivek Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct respondents No.1 to 4 to take appropriate action after taking note of the alleged illegal operation of ready-mix concrete plant of respondent No.6. 2. A perusal of the paper book would show that the petitioner had earlier filed a PIL-petition bearing CWP-PIL-87-2026 in which the following order was passed by the coordinate Division Bench: “1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to revisit the Court in case the grievance remains unaddressed. 2. With aforesaid liberty, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. PUNEET SACHDEVA 07.05.2026” 2026.07.15 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CWPNo.17402of2026 2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to move an appropriate application/petition in pursuance of the liberty granted by the coordinate Division Bench vide order dated 07.05.2026 in the abovesaid PIL. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not opined on the merits or on the maintainability or otherwise of any such application/petition which the petitioner proposes to file. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE July 14th, 2026 (SUBHAS MEHLA) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.07.15 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWPNo.17402of2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 123 CWP No.17402 of 2026 Date of decision: July 14th, 2026 Mahipal Tokas .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Vivek Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct respondents No.1 to 4 to take appropriate action after taking note of the alleged illegal operation of ready-mix concrete plant of respondent No.6. 2. A perusal of the paper book would show that the petitioner had earlier filed a PIL-petition bearing CWP-PIL-87-2026 in which the following order was passed by the coordinate Division Bench: “1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to revisit the Court in case the grievance remains unaddressed. 2. With aforesaid liberty, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. PUNEET SACHDEVA 07.05.2026” 2026.07.15 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CWPNo.17402of2026 2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to move an appropriate application/petition in pursuance of the liberty granted by the coordinate Division Bench vide order dated 07.05.2026 in the abovesaid PIL. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not opined on the merits or on the maintainability or otherwise of any such application/petition which the petitioner proposes to file. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE July 14th, 2026 (SUBHAS MEHLA) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.07.15 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh