Punjab & Haryana High Court
Surjit Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.
CWP/18546/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-07-14
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Kuldeep Tiwari
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
125 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18546-2026 Date of Decision : 14.07.2026 SURJIT SINGH .....Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present : Mr. Sharwan Sehgal, Advocate, for the petitioner (Through V.C.). Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab. KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral) 1. Through the instant petition, filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a direction upon respondents to pay the petitioner balance of his retiral benefits after counting his ad hoc service from the year 1981 to 23.01.1992, as continuous service without any break, alongwith with interest. 2. This Court on 01.07.2026, had passed the hereinafter extracted order:- “1. At this stage, without issuance of notice, the learned State counsel appearing for the respondents is directed to have appropriate instructions from the authority concerned and to apprise this Court, on the next date of hearing, of the time frame required by the said authority to furnish the requisite documents to the Indian Audit and Accounts Department in terms of Annexure P-6. 2. List on 14.07.2026 in the urgent list” 3. Today, learned State counsel, on instructions from Mr. Opneet Singh, Distt. Treasury Officer, Ludhiana, informs this Court, DHARAM VIR 2026.07.14 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-18546-2026 -2-
within a period of two weeks from today, the due benefits as admissible to the petitioner, will be released in his favour. 4. In view of the above statement, no further direction is required to be passed. Accordingly, the instant petition, is closed. 5. It goes without saying that, in case the respondent authorities, does not release due benefits as admissible to the petitioner, within the stipulated time period, he would be at liberty to get revive the instant petition, by filing an apposite application. 6. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (KULDEEP TIWARI) July 14, 2026 JUDGE dharamvir Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No DHARAM VIR 2026.07.14 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document