101 RA-CW-283-2026 IN CWP-30451-2025 HARBIR KAUR V/S AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA Present: - Mr. Krishan M. Vohra, Advocate and Ms. Upasana Thakur, Advocate for the applicant *** 1. The applicant through instant application is seeking review of order dated 28.04.2026 passed by this Court. 2. The application appears to be miserably misconceived. The review applicant has not tried to understand that Airport Authority has no power/authority to detain any passenger. It is the Immigration Bureau which detains any passenger on account of alert issued by competent authority. This fact was noted in order dated 28.04.2026 and is duly corroborated by written statement filed by respondent. Despite the said fact, the applicant has filed the present review application. 3. In the backdrop, no ground to entertain the review application is made out. 4. Dismissed. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 13.07.2026 Mohit Kumar MOHIT KUMAR 2026.07.13 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

101 RA-CW-283-2026 IN CWP-30451-2025 HARBIR KAUR V/S AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA Present: - Mr. Krishan M. Vohra, Advocate and Ms. Upasana Thakur, Advocate for the applicant *** 1. The applicant through instant application is seeking review of order dated 28.04.2026 passed by this Court. 2. The application appears to be miserably misconceived. The review applicant has not tried to understand that Airport Authority has no power/authority to detain any passenger. It is the Immigration Bureau which detains any passenger on account of alert issued by competent authority. This fact was noted in order dated 28.04.2026 and is duly corroborated by written statement filed by respondent. Despite the said fact, the applicant has filed the present review application. 3. In the backdrop, no ground to entertain the review application is made out. 4. Dismissed. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 13.07.2026 Mohit Kumar MOHIT KUMAR 2026.07.13 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.