IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 LPA-1850-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 10.07.2026 Vishwajeet Singh Bhadouria and Anr. ...Appellants Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. R. S. Bains, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Mandeep Singh Lamba, Advocate, & Mr. Utsav Singh Bains, Advocate, for the appellant. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL) 1. In the present appeal challenge is to the final judgment/order dated 23.04.2026 passed by learned Single Judge in CWP-4935-2026 titled Anand Chahal and others Vs. State of Haryana and others. 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the appellant submits that the deleted question of which, the appellant has given correct answer should not have been deleted as the same is causing prejudice. Learned Senior counsel submits that the said argument was not raised before the learned Single judge, hence, let the present appeal may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to raise the same before learned Single Judge in review. 2. Ordered accordingly. 3. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE July 10, 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) anil JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No ANIL KUMAR 2026.07.15 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 LPA-1850-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 10.07.2026 Vishwajeet Singh Bhadouria and Anr. ...Appellants Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. R. S. Bains, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Mandeep Singh Lamba, Advocate, & Mr. Utsav Singh Bains, Advocate, for the appellant. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL) 1. In the present appeal challenge is to the final judgment/order dated 23.04.2026 passed by learned Single Judge in CWP-4935-2026 titled Anand Chahal and others Vs. State of Haryana and others. 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the appellant submits that the deleted question of which, the appellant has given correct answer should not have been deleted as the same is causing prejudice. Learned Senior counsel submits that the said argument was not raised before the learned Single judge, hence, let the present appeal may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to raise the same before learned Single Judge in review. 2. Ordered accordingly. 3. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE July 10, 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) anil JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No ANIL KUMAR 2026.07.15 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document