CWP-26039-2022(O&M) -1- 219 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26039-2022(O&M) Date of Decision: 09.07.2026 KAMLESH DEVI AND OTHERS ....Petitioner (s) Versus UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS .....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: Mr.Anshul Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Jaivir Chandail, Addl. Standing Counsel and Mr. Amandeep Chuahan, Advocate, for respondent/U.T, Chandigarh. Ms. Saigeeta Srivastava, Advocate, for the respondent/Union of India. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned notice dated 19.10.2022 (Annexure P-9). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that as per the reply filed by the respondents, the impugned document (Annexure P-9) is only a show cause notice and the proceedings are still pending before the respondents. He further submitted that the petitioners will appear before the concerned authorities and file a reply to the aforesaid show cause notice (Annexure P-9) and he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, RAKESH KUMAR 2026.07.14 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-26039-2022(O&M) -2- with liberty to file a fresh petition in case any adverse order is passed against the petitioners.

3. Mr. Jaivir Chandail, learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-U.T, Chandigarh submitted that impugned document (Annexure P-9) is only a show cause notice and the final order is yet to be passed and adequate opportunity of hearing will be given to the petitioners in this regard before passing a final order. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is granted to the petitioners that in case any adverse order is passed against them, they may assail the same by filing a fresh petition in accordance with law. (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) JUDGE (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 09.07.2026 rakesh Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAKESH KUMAR 2026.07.14 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP-26039-2022(O&M) -1- 219 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26039-2022(O&M) Date of Decision: 09.07.2026 KAMLESH DEVI AND OTHERS ....Petitioner (s) Versus UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS .....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: Mr.Anshul Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Jaivir Chandail, Addl. Standing Counsel and Mr. Amandeep Chuahan, Advocate, for respondent/U.T, Chandigarh. Ms. Saigeeta Srivastava, Advocate, for the respondent/Union of India. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned notice dated 19.10.2022 (Annexure P-9). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that as per the reply filed by the respondents, the impugned document (Annexure P-9) is only a show cause notice and the proceedings are still pending before the respondents. He further submitted that the petitioners will appear before the concerned authorities and file a reply to the aforesaid show cause notice (Annexure P-9) and he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, RAKESH KUMAR 2026.07.14 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-26039-2022(O&M) -2- with liberty to file a fresh petition in case any adverse order is passed against the petitioners.

3. Mr. Jaivir Chandail, learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-U.T, Chandigarh submitted that impugned document (Annexure P-9) is only a show cause notice and the final order is yet to be passed and adequate opportunity of hearing will be given to the petitioners in this regard before passing a final order. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is granted to the petitioners that in case any adverse order is passed against them, they may assail the same by filing a fresh petition in accordance with law. (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) JUDGE (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 09.07.2026 rakesh Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAKESH KUMAR 2026.07.14 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment